From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DsoGP-0005ZH-Gu for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 20:55:29 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j6DKquI8011494; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 20:52:56 GMT Received: from smtp108.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp108.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.6]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j6DKhZAv011900 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 20:43:36 GMT Received: (qmail 55207 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2005 20:44:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.50.105?) (richard?j?fish@212.180.33.26 with plain) by smtp108.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Jul 2005 20:44:39 -0000 Message-ID: <42D57DE6.2050207@asmallpond.org> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 22:47:34 +0200 From: Richard Fish User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050623) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] udev & recent genkernel + gentoo-sources References: <200507131139.34961.dmitry@athabascau.ca> <200507131304.53283.dmitry@athabascau.ca> <42D574EC.7060905@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <42D574EC.7060905@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 90c7c826-a9c5-40f7-9a6f-60303ae8a1c0 X-Archives-Hash: c9bda6c8be4875a3907b03c88b0349ab Zac Medico wrote: >A. Khattri wrote: > > >>On Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Dmitry S. Makovey wrote: >> >> >> >> >>>Nope... might try it as well but my understanding that all genkernel >>>does is automates compilation/installation and makes sure options for >>>devfs or udev are on (depending on --[no]udev --[no]devfs flags). >>> >>> >>True, but a lot of people have had problems with genkernel that went away >>when they did a manual kernel build instead. >> >> >> >> > >In this case the problem is in the initrd so I can guarantee he won't have the same problem if he doesn't use root=/dev/ram0 with a broken initrd ;-). > > > Not quite, its an initramfs. Slightly different rules apply for initramfs vs initrd, so you also have to remove the "initrd" line from grub if you want to eliminate it. -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list