From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dqx2l-0006q9-CR for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 17:53:43 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j68HqGZa020203; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 17:52:16 GMT Received: from www.badapple.net (www.badapple.net [38.118.146.198]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j68HlfQb016856 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 17:47:42 GMT Received: from [192.168.0.3] (c-24-13-14-150.hsd1.il.comcast.net [24.13.14.150]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.badapple.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60D73A28A7 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 10:47:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <42CEBC47.2080602@badapple.net> Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 12:47:51 -0500 From: kashani User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Heads-Up sys-lib/ss breaks Apps References: <1120801115.29226.58.camel@neuromancer.home.net> <200507081152.44634.rbickers-list-gentoo-user@logicetc.com> In-Reply-To: <200507081152.44634.rbickers-list-gentoo-user@logicetc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 766bd923-8462-4f7a-93b7-c4ed1f193486 X-Archives-Hash: ef14da42170bc8e8ad61692fe95a64af Ron Bickers wrote: > On Fri July 8 2005 01:38 am, Ow Mun Heng wrote: > > >>Which is a huge bummer since most of us don't go checking the ebuilds >>for these specific lines. How I wish It would just abort and BLAST the >>Einfo on the screen for me to see the next day and decide to do it >>manually. > > > I have this concern as well. Also, when emerging multiple packages, the > helpful and sometimes necessary output at the end of each merge is easily > missed as the next package begins. It would be nice to at least have these > messages logged somewhere. Are they? Can they be without patching portage? > mkdir /var/log/portage echo "PORT_LOGDIR=/var/log/portage" >> /etc/make.conf kashani -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list