From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DqrQ2-0007TH-V7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 11:53:23 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j68BqQut018722; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 11:52:26 GMT Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j68BmVKj007662 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 11:48:32 GMT Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Jul 2005 11:48:39 -0000 Received: from p548BD83C.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.17.240]) [84.139.216.60] by mail.gmx.net (mp024) with SMTP; 08 Jul 2005 13:48:39 +0200 X-Authenticated: #26099252 Message-ID: <42CE68B4.9080207@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 13:51:16 +0200 From: Christian Heim User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050629) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Adding realtime-prempt kernel patches to gentoo-sources References: <5bdc1c8b05070710451075bdd5@mail.gmail.com> <42CD6F77.5030403@gmx.de> <5bdc1c8b05070713097ebe8d08@mail.gmail.com> <42CD911D.4040401@gmx.de> <5bdc1c8b05070714455d8473b5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5bdc1c8b05070714455d8473b5@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Archives-Salt: a9d03d2c-dd16-498c-8637-4e2850b8d001 X-Archives-Hash: 2c066ef54c5584579e76d3fc28247e9e Mark Knecht wrote: > Hi, > One more question if I might. What does this message mean? I'm > guessing that a patch in my patch file has already been applied in > gentoo-sources? If so then it would seem that I'd want to skip it. Is > that correct? Skipping the patch would seem reasonable if that's what > this means. > > Or am I misunderstanding this? > > Thanks, > Mark > > patching file include/asm-i386/string.h > Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] > Apply anyway? [n] > Skipping patch. > 9 out of 9 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file include/asm-i386/string.h.rej Yup, thats exactly the meaning of that message :) Christian -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list