From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dqapz-00049v-03 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 07 Jul 2005 18:11:03 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j67I9xIL021231; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 18:09:59 GMT Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j67I5HpM004936 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2005 18:05:17 GMT Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Jul 2005 18:05:17 -0000 Received: from p548BDB65.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.17.240]) [84.139.219.101] by mail.gmx.net (mp034) with SMTP; 07 Jul 2005 20:05:17 +0200 X-Authenticated: #26099252 Message-ID: <42CD6F77.5030403@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 20:07:51 +0200 From: Christian Heim User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050629) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Adding realtime-prempt kernel patches to gentoo-sources References: <5bdc1c8b05070710451075bdd5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5bdc1c8b05070710451075bdd5@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Archives-Salt: a9f7c39f-db37-4d28-9e5a-4747c9480074 X-Archives-Hash: ce359390c3409e80a37aee37aa504f0b Mark Knecht wrote: > QUESTIONS: > > 1) Can I assume that whatever happened with the "Hunk #x succeeded" > that everything is OK? Maybe this was just a line number issue? Yeah .. or and indent change or something similar. > > 2) What can I do about the "Hunk #x FAILED" messages? Well to get that patch working, you *need* to take a look at the *.rej files which are created by patch -p1 < realtime-prempt.patch. Most times this is only due to missing context. That means the line just before the one which should be added, is not there or another one is just in the way. So `patch` is unable to find the matching context. > > No output files were created since it was only a dry run. I can run > again, get output files, and then look into it but I thought I'd ask > how folks go about this sort of thing before I pulled the trigger. Regards Christian -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list