From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NSF8V-0003x0-NM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 19:32:21 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 88877E0ABC; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 19:31:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpout.karoo.kcom.com (smtpout.karoo.kcom.com [212.50.160.34]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AFFFE0ABE for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 19:31:33 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,506,1257120000"; d="scan'208";a="161680977" Received: from unknown (HELO compaq.stroller.uk.eu.org) ([213.152.39.90]) by smtpout.karoo.kcom.com with ESMTP; 05 Jan 2010 19:31:32 +0000 Received: from funf.stroller.uk.eu.org (funf.stroller.uk.eu.org [192.168.1.71]) by compaq.stroller.uk.eu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 908F613C63 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 19:31:28 +0000 (GMT) Message-Id: <408D0D78-C7E4-482B-ACDF-14104D5B77BF@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> From: Stroller To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <358eca8f1001050339p7af8806du6b30fc5755ce2db4@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: USB mass storage device slow in Gentoo, fast in Windows...? [SOLVED] Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 19:31:30 +0000 References: <58965d8a1001042126u6229e1c6mabfb9a315a1cd130@mail.gmail.com> <201001050621.40671.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <12279C6F-3E34-4FD2-AC41-EFB512801CFE@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <201001051040.25907.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <358eca8f1001050339p7af8806du6b30fc5755ce2db4@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Archives-Salt: 1c339bb2-dcac-4919-8f86-cab545e011c4 X-Archives-Hash: b6b0cf132a88ddb4d548c28e53acc306 On 5 Jan 2010, at 11:39, Mick wrote: > What does experience show to be a best option for a desktop that has: > > a) Single CPU? > b) Dual core? > c) Quad core? On 5 Jan 2010, at 12:38, Sz=E9n=E1si Istv=E1n wrote: > And what about the BFS scheduler? I know, that it isn't in the > mainline kernel, bit I've heard a lot of good about that. ... I didn't think we're supposed to talk about that. :-/ Stroller.=