From: Alex Schuster <wonko@wonkology.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Hoping someone can help explain distcc to me
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:41:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4044064.hXcqPjLJx7@weird> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E5118A4.50302@persimplex.net>
victor romanchuk writes:
> >> i had noticed that distcc is peevish about CFLAGS: these should be
> >> compatible on both client and server. in my case i made these
> >> similar on both machines (laptop is core2duo and desktop is
> >> core2quad; both are running amd64 arch)
> >
> > I don't think this is true - as long as the CHOST is identical, there
> > should be no problem.
>
> CHOST defines the arch (i686, amd64, arm ..) whilst CFLAGS control gcc
> behavior and the binary code generation produced by compiler. in my case
> core2quad (q8300) i'm using in the desktop supports sse4.1 instruction
> set and notebook powered with core2duo (t7600) does not have that cpu
> feature. having option `-msse4.1' set in CFLAGS at desktop side will
> causes frequent compilation failures (initiated by distcc) or, in worst
> case - arbitrary crashes at notebook when running binaries compiled in
> distributed distcc environment
But how could the gcc on the desktop, called via distcc, even see the CFLAGS
in the desktops make.conf? This just cannot be.
I have been using march=athlon-xp on my desktop, and yet used it as distcc
server for my Pentium-III notebook for years. Worked fine.
Wonko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-22 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-20 22:56 [gentoo-user] Hoping someone can help explain distcc to me Paul Hartman
2011-08-21 0:35 ` Peter Humphrey
2011-08-21 1:08 ` Paul Hartman
2011-08-21 1:58 ` Peter Humphrey
2011-08-21 2:46 ` Dale
2011-08-21 3:04 ` Matthew Finkel
2011-08-21 9:41 ` Peter Humphrey
2011-08-21 13:53 ` Joost Roeleveld
2011-08-21 16:27 ` Peter Humphrey
2011-08-21 17:42 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-08-24 11:04 ` Dale
2011-08-21 1:34 ` victor romanchuk
2011-08-21 10:38 ` Alex Schuster
2011-08-21 14:39 ` victor romanchuk
2011-08-22 20:41 ` Alex Schuster [this message]
2011-08-22 22:36 ` Bill Longman
2011-08-22 22:41 ` Bill Longman
2011-08-22 19:47 ` [gentoo-user] " Paul Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4044064.hXcqPjLJx7@weird \
--to=wonko@wonkology.org \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox