From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5B91391DB for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 20:55:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E49FEE0B0F; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 20:55:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpq1.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq1.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.42.164]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75E82E0AB1 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 20:55:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.42.134] (helo=smtp3.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq1.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XDJrA-0002fR-IO for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2014 22:55:16 +0200 Received: from 53579160.cm-6-8c.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([83.87.145.96] helo=data.antarean.org) by smtp3.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1XDJrA-00075i-53 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2014 22:55:16 +0200 Received: from [192.168.45.104] (53579160.cm-6-8c.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.87.145.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by data.antarean.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 27F3A4C for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 22:54:51 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <53DBCAE0.1050003@gmail.com> References: <53da455a.6193700a.4dbb.497d@mx.google.com> <425c4c55-e12a-4f63-8802-13793ce9cc0a@email.android.com> <53db1439.c91d980a.7d87.5eea@mx.google.com> <52108877.MzkzTK3Ytd@andromeda> <53DBCAE0.1050003@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] colord failed to upgrade From: "J. Roeleveld" Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 22:55:13 +0200 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <404197db-79b1-45a4-acf4-81b4ae3fea59@email.android.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Ziggo-spambar: ---- X-Ziggo-spamscore: -4.9 X-Ziggo-spamreport: ALL_TRUSTED=-1,BAYES_00=-1.9,DOS_RCVD_IP_TWICE_B=0.001,PROLO_TRUST_RDNS=-3,RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982 X-Ziggo-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Flag: No X-Archives-Salt: df51e0cd-4776-4789-a6c7-5e66470247f5 X-Archives-Hash: 7f8a869437bedd2c9ee343241df899fb On 1 August 2014 19:14:08 CEST, Alan McKinnon w= rote: >On 01/08/2014 10:07, J. Roeleveld wrote: >> On Friday, August 01, 2014 07:11:59 AM Gevisz wrote: >>=20 >>> On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 20:17:54 +0200 >>=20 >>> >>=20 >>> "J. Roeleveld" wrote: >>=20 >>> > On 31 July 2014 16:19:21 CEST, Gevisz wrote: >>=20 >>> > >On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:03:09 -0400 >>=20 >>> > > >>=20 >>> > >Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: >>=20 >>> > >> I can't comment on a long-term, real, proper solution, but for >>=20 >>> > >> right now >>=20 >>> > >> >>=20 >>> > >> emerge --oneshot dev-perl/XML-Parser >>=20 >>> > >> >>=20 >>> > >> should at least allow you to continue building colord. >>=20 >>> > > >>=20 >>> > >It seems that it helped, but not the suggestions from >>=20 >>> > > >>=20 >>> > > # perl-cleaner --all >>=20 >>> > > >>=20 >>> > >output. >>=20 >>> > > >>=20 >>> > >Thank you. >>=20 >>> > >>=20 >>> > Did you run the commands and then rerun perlcleaner as the output >>=20 >>> > mentions at the end of the text? >>=20 >>> >>=20 >>> No. I did not run perl-cleaner just after those 2 suggested commands >>=20 >>> because I had not noted that demand. So, my complaint that the >>=20 >>> suggested "long-term" solution does not work may be incorrect. >>=20 >> =20 >>=20 >> The claim is incorrect. I did what it said in the output and it >resolved >> the issue on my systems. >>=20 >> =20 >>=20 >>> However, I run perl-cleaner after >>=20 >>> >>=20 >>> # emerge --oneshot dev-perl/XML-Parser >>=20 >>> # emerge --update --deep --with-bdeps=3Dy --newuse --backtrack=3D60 >--ask >> world >>=20 >>> # emerge --depclean --ask >>=20 >>> >>=20 >>> So, I hope that the problem was fixed. >>=20 >> =20 >>=20 >> It should be resolved now. >>=20 >> I don't add the "--backtrack" part. >>=20 >> It hasn't been needed for me ever since I started using Gentoo >sometime >> in 2004. (Not sure when it got introduced?) > > > >s/(Not sure when it got introduced)/$1 or even what it is for?/g > >There ya go, fixed that for ya. > >This appears to hold true for every Gentoo'er in the universe except ><10 >people in the magic $I_GROK_PORTAGE group. > >I myself am not in that group. I've followed a few recent discussions in the gentoo-dev list where the b= acktrack option got sorta explained. To me it sounds like a classical compromise between being quick or being = thorough. With the choice being the same as when writing AI for a chess p= rogram. -- Joost --=20 Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.