From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-104068-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1NAhPl-0005Bn-Mv
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:05:29 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A568E0B61
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:05:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pw0-f47.google.com (mail-pw0-f47.google.com [209.85.160.47])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13DC6E060D
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:38:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pwi9 with SMTP id 9so621128pwi.26
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:38:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=uq0NfkDdckiVHHrd2m8aBtvjQ1Xcgze48noOohfxkYE=;
        b=FxBw7g1QGExjdkXvu08yWy2RGEXCc9OyRQR5/QnnWdLKbZz2yBXJQqqnvY2iP9C+oq
         2tknORZWFsDhg0Y0tX1qpdznB06TQr3ZyDX9o9UczrufBAYpOSfr9zmmM8YyXiWci+Qb
         MI6YBqSjrppLuXQB9M+dQglSfcZ2Hah2A0wuU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=Ai14NXgaDO1loMmn+oHxibj98fCP7quBZdYbBSN8slULtXbXKoZdflIM+mnTF/qzl1
         QPc8JO30/GspvnA2jrYcrfoiiVmHnn/F6n12/h1MWm1/0SSnWPvQ3GJ+nZM4ZitCEyN8
         G3hBQ9HZZpHH1i5621AJH3Vum/Pzf2FAuJMAQ=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.4.11 with SMTP id 11mr1285108wfd.86.1258533535670; Wed, 18 
	Nov 2009 00:38:55 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <200911180923.15863.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
References: <200911171806.45373.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
	 <200911172045.06037.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
	 <hdvaap$mmc$1@ger.gmane.org>
	 <200911180923.15863.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:38:55 +0900
Message-ID: <3ac129340911180038s729beb8al6a5aa902e7fc535@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Downgrade glibc-2.11 to 2.10
From: daid kahl <daidxor@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 9cc6cfb9-b3a7-4f5b-a601-a6c10cb3dd5d
X-Archives-Hash: f36c5f55128ae72736a5821fe54b9309

> Back on topic now :-) Apparently upstream is aware of this silly
> behaviour/bug, maybe I should wait a bit and see if they provide a knob to go
> back to the old behaviour

This sounds like a reasonable plan.  glibc downgrades aren't supported
not only because they are a pain in the rear, but they shouldn't be
required.