public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nelson, David \(ED, PAR&D\)" <David.Nelson2@astrazeneca.com>
To: <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] Symlinking /usr/portage/distfiles
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:51:30 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D60AF2712C16D42A38076E52FD6E3D23F0D70@ukmcrdembx01.rd.astrazeneca.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45C12AED.2040109@paradise.net.nz>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Kirkwood [mailto:markir@paradise.net.nz]
> Sent: 31 January 2007 23:49
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Symlinking /usr/portage/distfiles
> 
> 
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> > On Wednesday 31 January 2007 09:58, Alan McKinnon 
> > <alan@linuxholdings.co.za> wrote about 'Re: [gentoo-user] 
> > Symlinking /usr/portage/distfiles':
> >> On Wednesday 31 January 2007, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> >>> Furthermore Pentium 4 is a joke (it performs horribly). A 2 GHz
> >>> (Dothan I presume) Pentium-M should be faster than a 2,8 
> GHz Pentium
> >>> 4. My timing is for an 1,6 GHz (Banias) Pentium-M btw.
> >> This sounds odd, but I'm not a cpu expert so can't really 
> comment. Care
> >> to elaborate on why the P4 performs so horribly?
> > 
> > The instruction pipeline is very long, the CPU <-> RAM 
> bandwith is quite 
> > small, and the pipeline has to be emptied any time the 
> branch predictor is 
> > wrong.  While the pipeline fills, the CPU works but no results are 
> > visible.
> > 
> > Hz has never been a complete trump of other issues affecting CPU 
> > performance, but is always a factor to consider.  (Among 
> CPUs that are 
> > otherwise identical, higher Hz wins.)
> > 
> 
> Also Pentium-M has a lower latency L2 cache than P-4. With respect to 
> pipeline lengths I was curious to see what they actually 
> were: P-4 has 
> 20 stages, P-M has.. err... < 20 stages (Intel won't say exactly!).
> 
> I found this an interesting read for those of you interested in this:
> 
> http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2342&p=1
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Mark


At the risk of pulling this topic a little more off-topic - the P-M vs P-4 is an interesting case of a Pentium 3 chipset with a die shrink outperforming a P-4.

The Intel Core (2) Solo/Duo CPUs are based on the Pentium M as well. Netburst is pretty much dead afaik.

--
djn

Disclaimer: I represent no-one else in my emails to this list. Use any advice given at your own risk.

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-01  8:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-27 13:16 [gentoo-user] Symlinking /usr/portage/distfiles Vlad Dogaru
2007-01-27 13:29 ` Mick
2007-01-27 13:31 ` Dale
2007-01-27 16:40   ` Vlad Dogaru
2007-01-27 18:14     ` Jürgen Geuter
2007-01-27 19:05       ` Jeffrey Rollin
2007-01-27 19:52         ` Vlad Dogaru
2007-01-27 23:48         ` Neil Bothwick
2007-01-29  7:38     ` Alan McKinnon
2007-01-29 13:20       ` Albert Hopkins
     [not found]         ` <200701292112.22080.alan@linuxholdings.co.za>
2007-01-30  9:29           ` Neil Bothwick
2007-01-30 12:22           ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2007-01-30 13:09             ` Neil Bothwick
2007-01-30 12:59           ` Albert Hopkins
2007-01-30  7:25       ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
     [not found] ` <200701301422.12957.bo.andresen@zlin.dk>
     [not found]   ` <200701301552.37737.alan@linuxholdings.co.za>
2007-01-30 14:06     ` Uwe Thiem
2007-01-31 11:02       ` Alan McKinnon
2007-01-31 12:22         ` Uwe Thiem
2007-01-31 12:34           ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2007-01-31 13:23             ` Alan McKinnon
2007-01-31 13:22           ` Alan McKinnon
2007-01-31 13:38           ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2007-01-31 15:58             ` Alan McKinnon
2007-01-31 19:13               ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2007-01-31 23:49                 ` Mark Kirkwood
2007-02-01  8:51                   ` Nelson, David (ED, PAR&D) [this message]
2007-02-01  9:10                     ` Alan McKinnon
2007-02-01 18:43           ` Ralf Stephan
2007-02-01 20:41             ` Dan Farrell
2007-01-30 14:35   ` Neil Bothwick
2007-01-30 16:26     ` Anthony E. Caudel
2007-01-31 11:16       ` Alan McKinnon
2007-01-31 12:25         ` Dan Farrell
2007-02-01 10:30           ` Neil Bothwick
2007-01-31 15:22         ` Anthony E. Caudel
2007-01-30 19:10     ` Mick
2007-01-30 19:31       ` Neil Bothwick
2007-01-30 20:18       ` Albert Hopkins
2007-01-30 22:39         ` Neil Bothwick
2007-01-31  0:45           ` Steve Dibb
2007-01-31  1:22             ` Neil Bothwick
2007-01-31 10:37               ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3D60AF2712C16D42A38076E52FD6E3D23F0D70@ukmcrdembx01.rd.astrazeneca.net \
    --to=david.nelson2@astrazeneca.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox