public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stroller <stroller@stellar.eclipse.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] desktop & sever profiles;  was: Re: jpg support
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 17:13:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BEB556D-CEF7-4B04-A354-A487E8BB5F04@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4915B683.6090405@googlemail.com>


On 8 Nov 2008, at 15:55, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> Alan McKinnon schrieb am 08.11.2008 16:00:
>> ...
>> I'll bet your profile points to a server profile, not a desktop  
>> one. For the
>> server profile, the default is no X server and thus no jpeg. A  
>> quick search
>> shows me that all the desktop profiles enable jpeg by default - the  
>> expected
>> state for most users. You profile is dictated by what the /etc/ 
>> make.profile
>> symlink points to.
>> ...
>
> ... if you use Gentoo on a desktop enable the
> desktop profile. ...

I wouldn't be inclined to assume a new user might be using a server  
profile because last time I checked these spit out an ugly warning  
message about "this profile being untested" for EVERY SINGLE package  
emerged.

Eventually - after enabling PORTAGE_ELOG_* and being inundated with  
warning spam for packages which had compiled without problems - I was  
unable to tolerate this behaviour any longer & switched to a desktop  
profile instead.

So has something changed since I experienced this, or have many other  
people just been ignoring the nuisance of the warning messages?

I guess I chose a server profile in the first place because it seemed  
more "correct" for me to do so (seeing as all my machines are  
servers), but since I'm quite happy to put USE="-X -gtk -qt &c" in my  
make.conf I can't see that it makes much difference.

Stroller.




  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-08 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-08  4:48 [gentoo-user] jpg support Michael P. Soulier
2008-11-08  5:30 ` Nicolas Sebrecht
2008-11-08 10:48 ` Dirk Heinrichs
2008-11-08 11:15   ` Daniel Pielmeier
2008-11-08 14:08     ` Michael P. Soulier
2008-11-08 14:31       ` Dale
2008-11-08 15:26         ` Michael P. Soulier
2008-11-08 16:59           ` Dale
2008-11-09  3:58             ` Michael P. Soulier
2008-11-09 10:30               ` Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto
2008-11-09 11:22                 ` Michael P. Soulier
2008-11-08 15:00       ` Alan McKinnon
2008-11-08 15:55         ` Daniel Pielmeier
2008-11-08 17:13           ` Stroller [this message]
2008-11-08 17:35             ` [gentoo-user] desktop & sever profiles; was: " Daniel Pielmeier
2008-11-08 18:06               ` Stroller
2008-11-08 18:29                 ` Dale
2008-11-08 18:32                 ` Daniel Pielmeier
2008-11-08 18:13             ` Alan McKinnon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3BEB556D-CEF7-4B04-A354-A487E8BB5F04@stellar.eclipse.co.uk \
    --to=stroller@stellar.eclipse.co.uk \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox