From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kw73s-00042I-Hm for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 01 Nov 2008 03:22:04 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 619DAE053E; Sat, 1 Nov 2008 03:22:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yx-out-1718.google.com (yx-out-1718.google.com [74.125.44.153]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40FF7E053E for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2008 03:22:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yx-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 4so758125yxp.46 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 20:22:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=Q4lmwkdlWCQFWrLrlkqpFkf+zS7lmj2j7tjlkXtxPc8=; b=ekTKpDIJdfBkwm8wbMZ329yZFe2kniHUni6Pw4l8ZFnhedeCkuQUZMaaN99SBD/0Ez 4lpxDUG14ni6ApRtXHTjkDmx7z7bUfY8F4KziK79T+jbQGE4ye2KNfQFfEz/r/FH83h4 LviCMXqJnbO41MHV+XS0mfrPU3HsAIXU6VRkA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=C525XuH5ccAoSQJOU2yaJTyJmKdt+JmFDIKYanOk0iF1gESm3O4f4V+H0PEfvEX9L1 xow6WGIxCRXEvQntMt5ZXIQ6EZdu7mW4ojlI1tOrWUWoHpJtmeWd7l+SbAyOr3Cj7Pvz 9SUO1MgeqHBx3Yac6Gmvu4+4wnlHNQdgxWnyc= Received: by 10.90.53.5 with SMTP id b5mr1516375aga.74.1225509690765; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 20:21:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.81.1 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 20:21:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <38af3d670810312021w1973f5fbq1b129bece9dd6dd8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 01:21:30 -0200 From: "Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto" Sender: jorgepeixotomorais@gmail.com To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Why do these packages depend on corefonts? In-Reply-To: <20081101014017.GA22679@eriks> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20081101014017.GA22679@eriks> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9db1ac9a7c47d4c9 X-Archives-Salt: 2b1cb9a2-bab1-4b46-92ce-251afb43c0d5 X-Archives-Hash: 2ce613a83c81732c98ffbb19143626eb > Why the hell do these packages depend on corefonts?: > > app-emulation/wine-1.1.6 > net-www/netscape-flash-10_rc20080915 > x11-misc/slim-1.3.1 > > It somehow makes sense with wine, maybe even - remotely - with flash. > But why, why should *slim* need Windows fonts to work? Not only that, but why don't they also accept media-fonts/liberation-fonts? In my case it is media-gfx/imagemagick-6.4.0.6 that forces me to have media-fonts/corefonts, as I don't have installed any of the 3 packages you mentioned -- Software is like sex: it is better when it is free - Linus Torvalds