From: Peter Humphrey <peter@prh.myzen.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [gentoo-user] Two identical systems - different!
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 15:47:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3829715.r4QdiPJ1m6@wstn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201403040811.24482.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
On Tuesday 04 Mar 2014 08:11:12 Mick wrote:
> On Monday 03 Mar 2014 16:02:17 Peter Humphrey wrote:
--->8
> > I [...] got this output in each case:
> >
> > # qtbz2 -xO /usr/portage/packages/dev-libs/glib-2.36.4-r1.tbz2 |qxpak -x -
> > -O DEPEND
> > virtual/libiconv[abi_x86_32(-)] virtual/libffi[abi_x86_32(-)] sys-
> > libs/zlib[abi_x86_32(-)] || ( >=dev-libs/elfutils-0.142 >=dev-
> > libs/libelf-0.8.12 >=sys-freebsd/freebsd-lib-9.2_rc1 )
> > !<=app-emulation/emul- linux-x86-baselibs-20130224-r9
> > !app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs[- abi_x86_32(-)]
> > app-text/docbook-xml-dtd:4.1.2 >=dev-libs/libxslt-1.0 >=sys-
> > devel/gettext-0.11 >=dev-util/gtk-doc-am-1.15 !<dev-libs/gobject-
> > introspection-1.36 !<dev-util/gtk-doc-1.15-r2
> > !<sys-devel/gettext-0.18.1.1-r3
> > || ( >=sys-devel/automake-1.13:1.13 >=sys-devel/automake-1.14:1.14 )
> > || >=sys-
> > devel/autoconf-2.68 sys-devel/libtool app-arch/xz-utils >=sys-apps/sed-4
> > >=sys-apps/coreutils-8.5
> >
> > No mention of any kind of zip.
>
> Well, I see the following in the listed deps above:
>
> sys-libs/zlib[abi_x86_32(-)]
>
> app-arch/xz-utils
Well, yes. I just meant no bzip2 , gzip, lzip, rzip etc. Could have said it
better I suppose.
Anyway, both of those programs are present and I still can't see a way
forward. It doesn't help that I've only a user's knowledge of portage and its
innards. I'm currently taking a brute-force approach and running emerge -e
world on the Atom box, without using the packages built by the chroot on the
workstation. It looks as though it'll take two days or so.
Whatever I've tried, I still can't get owncloud installed properly, not even
by running their installer script to fetch and install version 6.0.2, just
released. That's why I felt forced into the brute-force method.
--
Regards
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-04 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-03 16:02 Fwd: Re: [gentoo-user] Two identical systems - different! Peter Humphrey
2014-03-04 8:11 ` Mick
2014-03-04 15:47 ` Peter Humphrey [this message]
2014-03-04 20:08 ` Mick
2014-03-04 23:38 ` Peter Humphrey
2014-03-05 13:49 ` Mick
2014-03-05 15:20 ` Peter Humphrey
2014-03-05 23:26 ` Mick
2014-03-08 11:18 ` Peter Humphrey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3829715.r4QdiPJ1m6@wstn \
--to=peter@prh.myzen.co.uk \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox