From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D975A1381FA for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 13:29:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A5F40E06B7; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 13:29:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bk0-f51.google.com (mail-bk0-f51.google.com [209.85.214.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB1CBE067D for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 13:27:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f51.google.com with SMTP id ik5so5504548bkc.10 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 05:27:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=T27yd+VpXDUvCN/T1reLzz/VA1f0y3L4ItHINeznpeM=; b=O9gCB8s6rXAcG64+jm2ApHhWXw3cEpapRKkd9qac7wXDiARCeLVdrwapZyil4OSbbz oCO9vdIK4ywXOtkKcnCqtas22rca3yBRNZ/1pyCSRUEEWc/9xjpwbRAOcxDnCM+vVQTr Xwmia+qMDiankD3YX1aEjDxRGe0S/kHyUtW1iUIiQM2BbQuL/PFboGIkUpq8G8SFE9n6 T7VbXCuSI/9rLsFaMUAd4HVwrZ0B2kMRdo/Bt/OIQyFOAJNHvTHH1nr2KwJFPLDhF3Gm aAZLbb9Fxb6Djyl1SoWDYFUivhwWx1hGZe02WzoRV2pPZQMAVS0CvmM+rE5gNw1+zhwM 8xuw== X-Received: by 10.204.129.202 with SMTP id p10mr19172042bks.56.1356960436245; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 05:27:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localnet (p4FC602D7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.198.2.215]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l17sm27521393bkw.12.2012.12.31.05.27.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 31 Dec 2012 05:27:15 -0800 (PST) From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Alan McKinnon Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] experiences with zfsonlinux? Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 14:27:14 +0100 Message-ID: <3793675.rgGzu8h5Hr@localhost> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.4 (Linux/3.4.24; KDE/4.9.4; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20121231090704.2910cd82@khamul.example.com> References: <1785965.eefX9SYzkP@localhost> <4217336.sd8MtAsg5n@localhost> <20121231090704.2910cd82@khamul.example.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Archives-Salt: 9d826e11-e320-4632-a484-86253b3be90e X-Archives-Hash: e40ad8d2604ebe30f95ec450145e2ba1 Am Montag, 31. Dezember 2012, 09:07:04 schrieb Alan McKinnon: > On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 04:42:45 +0100 > > Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > compared with the hours of fiddling when I started using raid this > > was pretty much straight forward - and yes, I know, destroying var > > was not necessary, but at that point I just wanted to try it... as I > > said, way too easy to throw away everything. > > If it's any comfort, > > rm -rf > fdisk > > are just as easy to type :-) yeah, but with fdisk I have to make changes AND save them, with lots of warnings. destroy on the other hand... just destroys.... > I suppose the zfs tools fall in that category of "for root use ONLY" > and need to be protected like the root account itself. Great power/great > responsibility and all that first thing I did, was changing permissions of zpios. ;) -- #163933