From: "Norman Rieß" <norman@smash-net.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: adsl rp-pppoe - new baselayout problem
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 08:56:09 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <37461.141.38.43.231.1150181769.squirrel@ulm114.server4you.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e6kpp4$q2s$1@sea.gmane.org>
>> The old rp-pppoe init script works without problems on my up-to-date
>> gentoo router. I prefer this way, too.
>
> Nobody needs the old init.d-script anymore.
Perhaps we don´t need it, but we like to use it.
The OP said he wanted to use the script. If he wants to use that, it´s his
decision, isn´t it?
> Here are the advantages of
> using baselayout:
>
> - you can unmerge rp-pppoe
I do not see any advantage in that.
And: The net.example tells to emerge rp-pppoe
[...]
#-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
# ADSL
# For ADSL support, emerge net-dialup/rp-pppoe
# You should make the following settings and also put your [...]
> - the pppoe-plugin provided by pppd uses the kernel PPPoE-implementation
> which is much faster (but experimental though)
Faster in what way? It surely does not speed up your adsl-connection and i
don´t give a damn on that 2,5 seconds at 5 o´clock in the morning, that it
takes to reconnect.
> - /etc/init.d/net.pppX is part of "net", /etc/init.d/rp-pppoe is not
> (which is an advantage because of scripts that depends on net)
I do not see an advantage in that, too.
> - ... more?
This is the wrong word, i think "something" would be nice. But that is my
point of view, others may have seen some advantages in that.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-13 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-11 18:19 [gentoo-user] adsl rp-pppoe - new baselayout problem Francisco J. A. Ares
2006-06-11 18:29 ` Raymond Lewis Rebbeck
2006-06-11 19:15 ` Francisco J. A. Ares
2006-06-11 19:13 ` [gentoo-user] " Sven Köhler
2006-06-11 20:59 ` Francisco J. A. Ares
2006-06-12 0:51 ` [gentoo-user] " Philip Webb
2006-06-12 21:45 ` Norman Rieß
2006-06-12 22:27 ` [gentoo-user] " Sven Köhler
2006-06-13 6:56 ` Norman Rieß [this message]
2006-06-13 16:55 ` Sven Köhler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=37461.141.38.43.231.1150181769.squirrel@ulm114.server4you.de \
--to=norman@smash-net.org \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox