public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Norman Rieß" <norman@smash-net.org>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user]  Re: adsl rp-pppoe - new baselayout problem
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 08:56:09 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <37461.141.38.43.231.1150181769.squirrel@ulm114.server4you.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e6kpp4$q2s$1@sea.gmane.org>

>> The old rp-pppoe init script works without problems on my up-to-date
>> gentoo router. I prefer this way, too.
>
> Nobody needs the old init.d-script anymore.

Perhaps we don´t need it, but we like to use it.

The OP said he wanted to use the script. If he wants to use that, it´s his
decision, isn´t it?


> Here are the advantages of
> using baselayout:
>
> - you can unmerge rp-pppoe

I do not see any advantage in that.
And: The net.example tells to emerge rp-pppoe

[...]
#-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
# ADSL
# For ADSL support, emerge net-dialup/rp-pppoe
# You should make the following settings and also put your [...]


> - the pppoe-plugin provided by pppd uses the kernel PPPoE-implementation
> which is much faster (but experimental though)

Faster in what way? It surely does not speed up your adsl-connection and i
don´t give a damn on that 2,5 seconds at 5 o´clock in the morning, that it
takes to reconnect.


> - /etc/init.d/net.pppX is part of "net", /etc/init.d/rp-pppoe is not
> (which is an advantage because of scripts that depends on net)

I do not see an advantage in that, too.


> - ... more?

This is the wrong word, i think "something" would be nice. But that is my
point of view, others may have seen some advantages in that.



-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-13  7:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-11 18:19 [gentoo-user] adsl rp-pppoe - new baselayout problem Francisco J. A. Ares
2006-06-11 18:29 ` Raymond Lewis Rebbeck
2006-06-11 19:15   ` Francisco J. A. Ares
2006-06-11 19:13 ` [gentoo-user] " Sven Köhler
2006-06-11 20:59   ` Francisco J. A. Ares
2006-06-12  0:51 ` [gentoo-user] " Philip Webb
2006-06-12 21:45 ` Norman Rieß
2006-06-12 22:27   ` [gentoo-user] " Sven Köhler
2006-06-13  6:56     ` Norman Rieß [this message]
2006-06-13 16:55       ` Sven Köhler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=37461.141.38.43.231.1150181769.squirrel@ulm114.server4you.de \
    --to=norman@smash-net.org \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox