From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3055B1396D9 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 06:46:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 231F6E0C09; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 06:46:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-x244.google.com (mail-oi0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C03ACE0843 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 06:46:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-x244.google.com with SMTP id g125so6924099oib.12 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 23:46:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to; bh=4exWBsoj/whu1a6dN9DNfRdyNC71LFLSTBdnAe2Vulk=; b=eAIrkCB/+iuPFYwuBsCLjwrfzcX1g038s+j2/lJOqTa5Fq9aupw9XkM3iWxK9lIk+W yDOOLKq85D4vNfnimSwKvuGmhR6FCVhZbfCimBZjvGNIefVt86zZplfaj8iLhAgqb8Am ixKKbbCZvITYCM6VJTMHJjPRTb5CgQkvciarIcTUj3WsRB+/z/KmxBlecZK3ErtmpvUF ROKmwDkBFOgKG2IiLSAVxJLDul3/l52PWdE//gdn44GUkVRz5u7+yAVh72s9/88QpL55 ct9OupJaXpo3o9kVTnqBfYBjhhMWts3kFVeJr12Ywf80d/wbgBOFUuYsB05t2bkQEUvn uY+w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=4exWBsoj/whu1a6dN9DNfRdyNC71LFLSTBdnAe2Vulk=; b=SAld/jzVZzJHXc47pqIJZG144JWBaZwJnNIpCinDt3+XduMqjGgET0LcorWHGS0aSt NO8c7PBhXbEoyob/3yY7Qc3Yrivyxla7LUdb77ip+s48QavNF8Y/Cxx7tMFZBAqpQJCF Zs1REeSBnKXqhtGoZoNTlWrLdriJGoOiah4H0k+ok5EqVp3zkU7dwEbQstj8sFMsr6+N rFpg1E1FuBrHYEKFh0jB2b/kxGlARtXEu4uNEQ+MGH3ab5v/gBInCO6ZvdnaGv6KaDTN Xto5xVDXY8/1hf2OboVUHuGOkFKXOD1j6FdkjzAlFwkLjDa6OnDEyapg56OW4F9gqOyu 8CGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaWtmu0suzhQwmEpbT2oh0TjivNXl4IsmCeZ0ISq5utpqyBOUQNY +A1i0Jt6OdSe4xFbx/tAVwU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QCmH/nWbB68bhaiuvJrxgygAbsw6X4q+n3fxWMp2zWdKx2ToKSm100Q0L9LPArkMxeqRX7u3Q== X-Received: by 10.202.52.2 with SMTP id b2mr760813oia.425.1507790790663; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 23:46:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-74-240-55-63.jan.bellsouth.net. [74.240.55.63]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o205sm6200231oig.39.2017.10.11.23.46.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Oct 2017 23:46:29 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Plasmashell consuming huge amounts of memory. To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org References: <28e1c23b-46d3-e0d5-f4ec-3166bc124c03@gmail.com> <6f77571e-e000-b337-25c7-6cda61ffc279@gmail.com> <88b2e148-ffd4-5fdc-7f65-295486b1c693@gmail.com> From: Dale Message-ID: <36412db4-5575-41e8-f1b2-665cb516a73e@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 01:46:28 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 SeaMonkey/2.49.3.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------24FF970F84EF48FFFBA7ADD3" X-Archives-Salt: dc05e548-a80f-437d-bd91-aa52a4cbe774 X-Archives-Hash: ab67682f3359b6c90ff641d06604c321 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------24FF970F84EF48FFFBA7ADD3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit P Levine wrote: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:40 AM, Dale >wrote: > > Hi, > > It's trying to install dev-qt/qtdeclarative-5.9.2.  I went back > and sort of started from the start.  Figured out where I made a > boo boo.  Now it tries to apply the patch but fails to apply > properly.  > >   > ​If you don't already​ >   > ​have ​dev-qt/qtdeclarative-5.9.2 installed then install it without > the patch.  Otherwise, I can't help you.  The patch was just meant to > be an attempt at a backport for a lesser version of​ dev-qt/qtdeclarative. > Well, that is the version that started the memory hogging.  Since my last restart, it seems to not be hogging up memory, yet anyway.  I tried to go back a version but it is causing all sorts of havoc.  I was having to remove unmask/keyword entries and add mask entries and it was just going round and round.  May just wait a bit and see if a new update comes out with a fix.  Thanks for trying tho.  At least it is possible that this is affecting enough users that it will get fixed.  Dale :-)  :-)  --------------24FF970F84EF48FFFBA7ADD3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
P Levine wrote:
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:40 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

It's trying to install dev-qt/qtdeclarative-5.9.2.  I went back and sort of started from the start.  Figured out where I made a boo boo.  Now it tries to apply the patch but fails to apply properly. 
 
​If you don't already​
 
​have ​dev-qt/qtdeclarative-5.9.2 installed then install it without the patch.  Otherwise, I can't help you.  The patch was just meant to be an attempt at a backport for a lesser version of​ dev-qt/qtdeclarative.



Well, that is the version that started the memory hogging.  Since my last restart, it seems to not be hogging up memory, yet anyway. 

I tried to go back a version but it is causing all sorts of havoc.  I was having to remove unmask/keyword entries and add mask entries and it was just going round and round.  May just wait a bit and see if a new update comes out with a fix. 

Thanks for trying tho.  At least it is possible that this is affecting enough users that it will get fixed. 

Dale

:-)  :-) 
--------------24FF970F84EF48FFFBA7ADD3--