From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-96155-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1MBpV7-0007uZ-F8
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 12:23:25 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 67424E02AC;
Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:23:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-fx0-f219.google.com (mail-fx0-f219.google.com [209.85.220.219])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279B9E02AC
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:23:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so8094738fxm.34
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=P0Wu0PBunfHYqm+BYTPPyS+7uImg9uDlZpbu5zNvHiQ=;
b=tai93bG2Dw1Y1xZqYIwIsHixFxDah/n+9fU7Yghk883Dw/ukslbHFialZDKZGG9G3M
Wk23LuDAhKMS5I1bsWkBIVOJ2Lvc6KFS7PBk5vqy1jfkq0E8/ePpzK5qq8YW3iZNneP2
JJ12qepu2FyGAoPMKgylOT3+KNCN2eULRX6j4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=mw2SfwVx1UwIGpqJK1SlR26SZPp24vX2q8isJriqtyIeZU4fRpsNWbRy/nr7UtWe/0
R7NQEamaG+VAUYqujFAlF4VKe+LG4rXUZciXYq9Vfn/wq6GFFdKcJtXK04aKN2vp8njc
mC6h7wY0JiQtPquDsjpXWoWTXGIu6HWBhn+o4=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.118.207 with SMTP id w15mr832074bkq.97.1244031803364; Wed,
03 Jun 2009 05:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <200906031341.28198.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
References: <358eca8f0906030435s69a58d78v300464d8089f57d9@mail.gmail.com>
<200906031341.28198.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:23:23 +0100
Message-ID: <358eca8f0906030523h5c460e9el672f864cab9656ce@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Qt-core-4.5.1 jamboree not optimised for i686
From: Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: e858427d-920e-4756-a693-6e887d7552c2
X-Archives-Hash: 1c8cbc53ea8cdeb0098d12e44664c566
2009/6/3 Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>:
> On Wednesday 03 June 2009 13:35:04 Mick wrote:
>> Major build this morning of qt with a lot of blockers. =A0Having
>> unmerged a lot of packages to remove the blockers I am now emerging
>> qt-core. =A0I noticed this on my screen:
>>
>> Determining system architecture... (Linux:2.6.29-gentoo-r5:i686)
>> =A0 =A0 32-bit Intel 80x86 (i386)
>> =A0 =A0 'i386' is supported
>> System architecture: 'i386'
>> Symbol visibility control enabled.
>> Symbolic function binding enabled.
>>
>> This is the Qt/X11 Open Source Edition.
>>
>> Since I have these in make.conf I would think that a package like qt
>> would compile optimised code for my architecture, not just i386?
>>
>> ARCH=3D"x86"
>> CFLAGS=3D"-O2 -march=3Dpentium3 -fomit-frame-pointer -msse -mmmx -pipe"
>> MAKEOPTS=3D"-j2"
>> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=3D"x86"
>> CHOST=3D"i686-pc-linux-gnu"
>> CXXFLAGS=3D"${CFLAGS}"
>>
>> Just curious.
>
> architecture !=3D cpu type
>
> in this case architecture is things like i386, sparc, mips, arm
Hey! I knew that!
Thanks :)
--=20
Regards,
Mick