From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-96153-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1MBokM-0007z8-LW
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 11:35:06 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB903E051F;
Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:35:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-bw0-f175.google.com (mail-bw0-f175.google.com [209.85.218.175])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68013E051F
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:35:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bwz23 with SMTP id 23so7672494bwz.34
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 04:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject
:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=ZL1gKcBcN7gXjmvAfr33ThfcBqZDFe3u4dHOwK8KHak=;
b=eADRO/maVz9HlP1j4AcFlxaPhsmYQ6SekjbvyXNbiClG2yabvIhxqxuzYn85LreSo7
U39NuMY5nNDwkFdmX3iYeYTFpx1YH6QkMTYKjeSO1DyE1fWno+c4m4+DBmkCwyA50++D
/bbEOkMDNy1vE6kIKZ6C+6MgQQcA7+YggGRhc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
b=Sv4mFjxx0gHeFJeROi4cORlpN9TvTCfMKk255KYM1BZ+Q6NP3aSSE5UnmJnku8sy7G
NNvZO6z6c+oMWkueIv0UifgAzKaiLvNQgAJKLsxYL3XIeCUvs9ur4+gm4GsC5UP80VWN
vvJrjUDEWPyKTGm55k3qMjS4tPwIYVRhhHNxs=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.114.140 with SMTP id e12mr804873bkq.68.1244028904719; Wed,
03 Jun 2009 04:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:35:04 +0100
Message-ID: <358eca8f0906030435s69a58d78v300464d8089f57d9@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Qt-core-4.5.1 jamboree not optimised for i686
From: Mick <michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 7b384f8f-55c4-417f-ade5-24e65db750f8
X-Archives-Hash: e3465667333206e072a659600e9b9956
Major build this morning of qt with a lot of blockers. Having
unmerged a lot of packages to remove the blockers I am now emerging
qt-core. I noticed this on my screen:
Determining system architecture... (Linux:2.6.29-gentoo-r5:i686)
32-bit Intel 80x86 (i386)
'i386' is supported
System architecture: 'i386'
Symbol visibility control enabled.
Symbolic function binding enabled.
This is the Qt/X11 Open Source Edition.
Since I have these in make.conf I would think that a package like qt
would compile optimised code for my architecture, not just i386?
ARCH="x86"
CFLAGS="-O2 -march=pentium3 -fomit-frame-pointer -msse -mmmx -pipe"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"
Just curious.
--
Regards,
Mick