From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KsIo7-0003px-SE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:06:04 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F02FE0394; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:06:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gx0-f19.google.com (mail-gx0-f19.google.com [209.85.217.19]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1342BE0394 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:06:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk12 with SMTP id 12so5491486gxk.10 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:05:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=7yBvqSLvv7yFbDbNeobJo0ujDiioGQHkGsxZZ1udSbw=; b=Klg430XGX6diWGlf50ZnYz762T7yx4/x27podtSHD1YU9xT1+VrYik2xR9aeCwyvVT 5nFH3kPIwek+isg5rt8ON8BgYLdgozB7033bFYWfg7RO3GD0abklCF+t0+AkjW3jVBZe 0EJfuOnOq8nq9G/Y420xGT3TDs/McqHzfd92Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=newPwEt2Vpr0ZNbAcHApCsq/ZGnFDFZBgrvKxRCP1Ncs31OCia0KvGoLn5A5QftU9i NvhYjLD9ut/rQE85Y4MdfARvmbnO0dZnO/lCoObomKh1L9+WRkvehlEm4ug4S/bOnXOX BuEIKc4BbwYdcqyM+n4wgAEnEY/Qu4IRVvnuQ= Received: by 10.142.89.13 with SMTP id m13mr3781947wfb.338.1224601558831; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:05:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.12.21 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:05:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <358eca8f0810210805y2c3d7389ta38b6433b17445bf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:05:58 +0100 From: Mick To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ftp transfer dies In-Reply-To: <20081021112812.7a3c21b1@rabbit.robbieab.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200810210615.35765.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <58965d8a0810202257q2943dd30m232a64aff945f63f@mail.gmail.com> <200810210822.10808.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <20081021112812.7a3c21b1@rabbit.robbieab.com> X-Archives-Salt: e3fe90c8-a978-4604-9128-27b438450776 X-Archives-Hash: 905502d77f6874b45c2b38acfb8eb8a8 2008/10/21 Robert Bridge : > On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:21:49 +0100 > Mick wrote: > >> On Tuesday 21 October 2008, Paul Hartman wrote: >> > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:15 AM, Mick >> > wrote: >> > > Hi All, >> > > >> > > Any idea why this happens: >> > > ======================================== >> > > 150 Ok to send data. >> > > 100% |***********************************| 224 MiB 46.74 >> > > KiB/s 00:00 ETA >> > > 226 File receive OK. >> > > 235279855 bytes sent in 1:21:59 (46.70 KiB/s) >> > > local: xab remote: xab >> > > 227 Entering Passive Mode (205,178,145,65,166,71) >> > > 150 Ok to send data. >> > > 34% |*********** | 115 MiB 46.80 >> > > KiB/s 1:19:27 ETAtnftp: Writing to network: Connection reset by >> > > peer 0% | | -1 0.00 >> > > KiB/s --:-- ETA >> > > 500 OOPS: child died >> > > ======================================== >> > > >> > > It is rare that I am able to complete more than a single file >> > > transfer before the "connection is reset by peer". As these are >> > > relatively large files and the upload is unattended this is >> > > rather annoying. -- >> > > Regards, >> > > Mick >> > >> > That used to happen to me when I was using a piece-of-junk D-Link >> > router. It was one of those $29.99 consumer-grade deals. It would >> > reboot itself constantly when it was under any kind of load. I >> > replaced it with a $50 router with DD-WRT and things have been fine >> > ever since. Might not have anything to do with your problem, but I >> > figured I'd mention it. Check your router logs to see if it's having >> > any problems. >> >> Thanks Paul, >> >> On the client side I am running a $500 professional grade router and >> I assume that the server ISP is also running something upmarket in >> their data center. >> >> On this topic the client-server arrangement straddles the Atlantic >> ocean, so who knows how many routers and switches it jumps across. >> That said the failure pattern is consistent: first file always >> transfers cleanly, then second transfer fails after a while. Could >> it be some configured disk/account quote, dropping transfers above a >> certain size on the (Unix) server? > > Are you running through a proxy? No, although I would love to be able to do that at work! They only allow port 80 to get out through the corporate gateway and probably are running some clever filters on their Cisco routers to stop other protocols. -- Regards, Mick