public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Schreckenbauer <grimlog@gmx.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok)
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:05:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3551015.hMTTh4mEhf@pc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yu9ehyhypew.fsf@nyu.edu>

On Thursday, 13. October 2011 09:47:03 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13 2011, Michael Mol wrote:
> > I've skipped most of the thread, so forgive me if this was already
> > done...try rebuilding libmozjs? Bumping its version up or down?
> 
> oldlap ~ # equery b /usr/lib/libmozjs185.so
>  * Searching for /usr/lib/libmozjs185.so ...
> dev-lang/spidermonkey-1.8.5 (/usr/lib/libmozjs185.so -> libmozjs185.so.1.0)
> dev-lang/spidermonkey-1.8.5 (/usr/lib/libmozjs185.so.1.0.0)
> 
> [I] dev-lang/spidermonkey
>      Available versions:  1.7.0 (~)1.7.0-r1 (~)1.7.0-r2 1.8.2.15 {M}(~)1.8.5
> {static-libs test threadsafe unicode} Installed versions:  1.8.5(02:22:11
> PM 10/12/2011)(-static-libs -test)
> 
> So the installed version is the only one from gnome3.  I tried
> 
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> [ebuild     UD ] dev-lang/spidermonkey-1.8.2.15 [1.8.5] USE="-threadsafe%
> (-static-libs%) (-test%)" 50,345 kB
> 
> and received a slot conflict with dev-libs/gjs.
> 
> I worry trying to downgrade may lead to a string of dependencies.  I can
> try it tonight if desired.

hmm, for sure your problem is not video-related then.
gjs is the javascript-bindings for gnome...
You could try keeping spidermonkey at 1.8.5 and (re-)build the latest version 
of gjs.
google-ing your problem clearly shows: you are not alone. Sadly I was not able 
to find a solution for your problem yet as most others use ancient versions and 
updates solved it for them.

> thanks,
> allan

Best,
Michael




  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-10-13 15:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-11 22:13 [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok) Allan Gottlieb
2011-10-11 22:30 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-11 23:42   ` David Abbott
2011-10-12  1:19     ` Allan Gottlieb
2011-10-12  1:18   ` Allan Gottlieb
2011-10-12  1:37     ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-12 14:26       ` David Abbott
2011-10-12 16:52         ` Allan Gottlieb
2011-10-12 15:31   ` Allan Gottlieb
2011-10-12 16:49     ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-12 20:58       ` Allan Gottlieb
2011-10-12 21:19         ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-12 21:53           ` Allan Gottlieb
2011-10-12 22:08             ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-12 22:16               ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-10-12 22:25                 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-12 22:27               ` Allan Gottlieb
2011-10-12 22:52                 ` Allan Gottlieb
2011-10-13  0:04                   ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-13  0:02                 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-13  1:20                   ` Allan Gottlieb
2011-10-13  1:36                     ` Allan Gottlieb
2011-10-13  4:10                       ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-13 13:39                         ` Allan Gottlieb
2011-10-13  8:58                       ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-10-13 13:29                         ` Allan Gottlieb
2011-10-13 13:36                           ` Michael Mol
2011-10-13 13:47                             ` Allan Gottlieb
2011-10-13 13:53                               ` Michael Mol
2011-10-13 15:05                               ` Michael Schreckenbauer [this message]
2011-10-14  1:03                                 ` Allan Gottlieb
2011-10-12 21:40         ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-10-12 22:02           ` Allan Gottlieb
2011-10-12 22:10             ` Michael Schreckenbauer
2011-10-12 22:46               ` Allan Gottlieb
2011-10-13  0:03                 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-13 13:34           ` Allan Gottlieb
2011-10-13 18:45             ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-14  1:20               ` Allan Gottlieb
2011-10-14  1:58                 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2011-10-14  2:44                   ` Allan Gottlieb
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-10-13 12:21 Denis I. Polukarov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3551015.hMTTh4mEhf@pc \
    --to=grimlog@gmx.de \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox