From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-85669-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1KvKNv-0001pY-W7
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:23:32 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 032B0E0325;
Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:23:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from yx-out-1718.google.com (yx-out-1718.google.com [74.125.44.154])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9C6AE0325
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:23:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by yx-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 4so113391yxp.46
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
bh=adVh79UStpP/u+KLmnwZMjFK5wi0GNrDI1ADXNmt2uQ=;
b=sonetgtCyAkA13rpoq1M7R84J9y50iZtuk5o8071cvaEWU5bU7fF421XxWkbJ6SrqU
0LlHIVsBG2/+G9Y7AnIgAsTVeWzHSNGfEZsEkegGsuKK3wsM2FvBlfXlh/RN1iCn+4M+
7hDXx+GKAgKbV7jd+9pcD8Y67PLLYtalD3r9Y=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
:content-type:references;
b=RnI8PBcl01yyRYbJWql9vs1NDU6VyzNosez8mXrfWuDmD0tz4goatIcFgJJZB4QSeG
hY/Xo/zFKDOnjj4fJeIUFwDCcts5gp1U7yyK4x3Fv26rdzwG11A33qNimGul9GH24H98
5YIJOR2ak1AkX0rwev1fgUV63tzyg0x1sq5e4=
Received: by 10.150.177.20 with SMTP id z20mr17319485ybe.200.1225322610336;
Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.150.198.18 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <350fc7cf0810291623j5fb5608rf311cd0d2a371d2a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:23:30 -0700
From: "Andrey Falko" <ma3oxuct@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A question about emerge --info
In-Reply-To: <e38d12ff0810291613t6205b80em1294991c930ce1cf@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_53710_22372392.1225322610295"
References: <58965d8a0810291553x50e4068ehc58834dfdbce285b@mail.gmail.com>
<350fc7cf0810291609v335f4909nbcd90ab7d368cb5d@mail.gmail.com>
<e38d12ff0810291613t6205b80em1294991c930ce1cf@mail.gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: c93e9c64-8a17-4703-b006-77b034589ede
X-Archives-Hash: eef29fd4c4cf141ef46bc402775d89e3
------=_Part_53710_22372392.1225322610295
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Andrey Vul <andrey.vul@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Andrey Falko <ma3oxuct@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Paul Hartman
> > <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com <paul.hartman%2Bgentoo@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> I've always been curious about something in emerge --info's output:
> >>
> >> $ emerge --info
> >> Portage 2.2_rc12 (default/linux/amd64/2008.0/desktop, gcc-4.3.2,
> >> glibc-2.8_p20080602-r0, 2.6.27-gentoo-r1 x86_64)
> >> =================================================================
> >> System uname:
> >>
> >> Linux-2.6.27-gentoo-r1-x86_64-Intel-R-_Core-TM-2_CPU_6600_@
> _2.40GHz-with-glibc2.2.5
> >> Timestamp of tree: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:31:02 +0000
> >>
> >> Why does it show the glibc-2.8 on the second line but glibc2.2.5 on the
> >> fifth?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Paul
> >>
> >
> > My best guess is that your kernel was compiled by a toolchain that was
> > running on glibc2.2.5
> >
> > See what happens if you recompile the kernel under the newer toolchain.
> >
> 2.6.27 uses glibc? Really?
> I'm asking lkml what's happening.
>
>
> --
> Andrey Vul
>
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> A: Top-posting.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
>
>
Well it doesn't use glibc per se, gcc uses the glibc.....however, his uname
-a output does look funky.
Here is mine: System uname: 2.6.24.7 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6700 @
2.66GHz
Did all underscores make it there by accident? What happens when you do a
plain uname -a?
------=_Part_53710_22372392.1225322610295
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Andrey Vul <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:andrey.vul@gmail.com">andrey.vul@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Andrey Falko <<a href="mailto:ma3oxuct@gmail.com">ma3oxuct@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Paul Hartman<br>
> <<a href="mailto:paul.hartman%2Bgentoo@gmail.com">paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> I've always been curious about something in emerge --info's output:<br>
>><br>
>> $ emerge --info<br>
>> Portage 2.2_rc12 (default/linux/amd64/2008.0/desktop, gcc-4.3.2,<br>
>> glibc-2.8_p20080602-r0, 2.6.27-gentoo-r1 x86_64)<br>
>> =================================================================<br>
>> System uname:<br>
>><br>
>> Linux-2.6.27-gentoo-r1-x86_64-Intel-R-_Core-TM-2_CPU_6600_@_2.40GHz-with-glibc2.2.5<br>
>> Timestamp of tree: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:31:02 +0000<br>
>><br>
>> Why does it show the glibc-2.8 on the second line but glibc2.2.5 on the<br>
>> fifth?<br>
>><br>
>> Thanks,<br>
>> Paul<br>
>><br>
><br>
> My best guess is that your kernel was compiled by a toolchain that was<br>
> running on glibc2.2.5<br>
><br>
> See what happens if you recompile the kernel under the newer toolchain.<br>
><br>
</div></div>2.6.27 uses glibc? Really?<br>
I'm asking lkml what's happening.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
<br>
--<br>
Andrey Vul<br>
<br>
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.<br>
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?<br>
A: Top-posting.<br>
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>Well it doesn't use glibc per se, gcc uses the glibc.....however, his uname -a output does look funky. <br><br>Here is mine: System uname: <a href="http://2.6.24.7">2.6.24.7</a> x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6700 @ 2.66GHz<br>
<br>Did all underscores make it there by accident? What happens when you do a plain uname -a?<br>
------=_Part_53710_22372392.1225322610295--