On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Andrey Vul <andrey.vul@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Andrey Falko <ma3oxuct@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Paul Hartman
> <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I've always been curious about something in emerge --info's output:
>>
>> $ emerge --info
>> Portage 2.2_rc12 (default/linux/amd64/2008.0/desktop, gcc-4.3.2,
>> glibc-2.8_p20080602-r0, 2.6.27-gentoo-r1 x86_64)
>> =================================================================
>> System uname:
>>
>> Linux-2.6.27-gentoo-r1-x86_64-Intel-R-_Core-TM-2_CPU_6600_@_2.40GHz-with-glibc2.2.5
>> Timestamp of tree: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:31:02 +0000
>>
>> Why does it show the glibc-2.8 on the second line but glibc2.2.5 on the
>> fifth?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Paul
>>
>
> My best guess is that your kernel was compiled by a toolchain that was
> running on glibc2.2.5
>
> See what happens if you recompile the kernel under the newer toolchain.
>
2.6.27 uses glibc? Really?
I'm asking lkml what's happening.


--
Andrey Vul

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?


Well it doesn't use glibc per se, gcc uses the glibc.....however, his uname -a output does look funky.

Here is mine: System uname: 2.6.24.7 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6700 @ 2.66GHz

Did all underscores make it there by accident? What happens when you do a plain uname -a?