From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-77335-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Jd8TW-0001qv-Ac
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:29:50 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 98D09E07F6;
	Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.172])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634BEE07F6
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 27so2012790wfd.10
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 11:29:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        bh=AGGxFpXHUIZDbtqO2kcNNMWuO2Ks6atN36IiUAM/pjA=;
        b=RrgXLYLkn8IeNYvtrk8JMPMxdtR3MwMTw0k3gVUJVAV9b7wiErtYkumVfogz2Ssv8QqjvqvdCgrL3sC40aQLRjFM/Oxw1xseYFAm/Zo2GQxPa80FjGfwbKb9Hr27APeAM0tlEy7EWOazGLlANsNvHl9j35csK8XXedagkWbHwOU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=lHpKqJXdwCh82n4P8MU8pe8Gk1sy2w4Y1Wxph5dllvJxCR6L7YAIU3mduUhEHH1cu7NDQFC+1/ueZqgLZ4bgUtcoB4dkUgJP8MqKFJI9h7K4+ld38jIGUmmK06tQVv5xhxLOAl2TMYr8ecASbVPPt/IfEZF/RxZsq1dn9OS/zX4=
Received: by 10.142.102.5 with SMTP id z5mr3273137wfb.85.1206210587854;
        Sat, 22 Mar 2008 11:29:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.105.5 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 11:29:47 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <350fc7cf0803221129u4871ae15i91b407731f2a6a5a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:29:47 -0400
From: "Andrey Falko" <ma3oxuct@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] AMD vs. Intel on Gentoo?
In-Reply-To: <49bf44f10803221109p4593731w1ed0830194141a16@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <49bf44f10803221007v27627160xa0b0daadc4bcc0ff@mail.gmail.com>
	 <47E54579.6060202@smash-net.org>
	 <1206208709.30987.9.camel@NOTE_GENTOO64.PHHEIMNETZ>
	 <49bf44f10803221109p4593731w1ed0830194141a16@mail.gmail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: 906bf897-67af-4762-81e0-c960310ab9c0
X-Archives-Hash: 2d188c4e65c12d200ed7cf6e843544cf

On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >  > > I had become an AMD guy, but I think I'm hearing that Intel is beating
>  >  > > AMD in performance tests.  Plus my AMD64 X2 desktop should be much
>  >  > > faster than my Intel laptop but is actually slower.  What do you guys
>  >  > > think?
>  >  > >
>  >  > > - Grant
>  >  > >
>  >  > Well the experience of a desktop or an application depends on more than
>  >  > just the processor. Nearly every part of a computer does its part. And
>  >  > then you have the software, what software you use, how it is build, what
>  >  > reqirements this software has on other software and hardware and so on.
>  >  > Does it uses the FPU or is it heavy on the ALU. How much IO is used and
>  >  > how much can the system provide.
>  >  > But if you believe the average hardwaremagazine, intel is a step ahead
>  >  > right now.
>  >  >
>  >  > Norman
>  >
>  >  When Intel finally implements HyperTransport (I think it's planned for
>  >  the next generation), AMD will loose their last bastion performance
>  >  wise ... what a pity.
>
>  It is a pity.  When did AMD's overall advantage disappear?
>
>  - Grant
>
When Intel came out with its Core Two Duo CPUs, and *really* when
Intel came out with Quad Cores before AMD.
>
> --
>  gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list