From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jd8TW-0001qv-Ac for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:29:50 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 98D09E07F6; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.172]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634BEE07F6 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 27so2012790wfd.10 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 11:29:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=AGGxFpXHUIZDbtqO2kcNNMWuO2Ks6atN36IiUAM/pjA=; b=RrgXLYLkn8IeNYvtrk8JMPMxdtR3MwMTw0k3gVUJVAV9b7wiErtYkumVfogz2Ssv8QqjvqvdCgrL3sC40aQLRjFM/Oxw1xseYFAm/Zo2GQxPa80FjGfwbKb9Hr27APeAM0tlEy7EWOazGLlANsNvHl9j35csK8XXedagkWbHwOU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lHpKqJXdwCh82n4P8MU8pe8Gk1sy2w4Y1Wxph5dllvJxCR6L7YAIU3mduUhEHH1cu7NDQFC+1/ueZqgLZ4bgUtcoB4dkUgJP8MqKFJI9h7K4+ld38jIGUmmK06tQVv5xhxLOAl2TMYr8ecASbVPPt/IfEZF/RxZsq1dn9OS/zX4= Received: by 10.142.102.5 with SMTP id z5mr3273137wfb.85.1206210587854; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 11:29:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.105.5 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 11:29:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <350fc7cf0803221129u4871ae15i91b407731f2a6a5a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 14:29:47 -0400 From: "Andrey Falko" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] AMD vs. Intel on Gentoo? In-Reply-To: <49bf44f10803221109p4593731w1ed0830194141a16@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <49bf44f10803221007v27627160xa0b0daadc4bcc0ff@mail.gmail.com> <47E54579.6060202@smash-net.org> <1206208709.30987.9.camel@NOTE_GENTOO64.PHHEIMNETZ> <49bf44f10803221109p4593731w1ed0830194141a16@mail.gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 906bf897-67af-4762-81e0-c960310ab9c0 X-Archives-Hash: 2d188c4e65c12d200ed7cf6e843544cf On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Grant wrote: > > > > > I had become an AMD guy, but I think I'm hearing that Intel is beating > > > > AMD in performance tests. Plus my AMD64 X2 desktop should be much > > > > faster than my Intel laptop but is actually slower. What do you guys > > > > think? > > > > > > > > - Grant > > > > > > > Well the experience of a desktop or an application depends on more than > > > just the processor. Nearly every part of a computer does its part. And > > > then you have the software, what software you use, how it is build, what > > > reqirements this software has on other software and hardware and so on. > > > Does it uses the FPU or is it heavy on the ALU. How much IO is used and > > > how much can the system provide. > > > But if you believe the average hardwaremagazine, intel is a step ahead > > > right now. > > > > > > Norman > > > > When Intel finally implements HyperTransport (I think it's planned for > > the next generation), AMD will loose their last bastion performance > > wise ... what a pity. > > It is a pity. When did AMD's overall advantage disappear? > > - Grant > When Intel came out with its Core Two Duo CPUs, and *really* when Intel came out with Quad Cores before AMD. > > -- > gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list > > -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list