From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1867C138A6C for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 15:26:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 151B8E0850; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 15:26:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01a.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01a.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF94FE07DF for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 15:26:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=wstn.localnet) by smarthost01a.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YgapE-0002FV-10 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 15:26:32 +0000 From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is perl broken? Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:26:31 +0100 Message-ID: <34848643.94B99lRfOc@wstn> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (Linux/3.18.11-gentoo; KDE/4.14.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <12643814.y82zEeNuqf@wstn> References: <2929378.CsdgesgsUa@wstn> <12643814.y82zEeNuqf@wstn> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Originating-smarthost01a-IP: [82.69.80.10] X-Archives-Salt: 7d82316e-f60f-4ad4-b6c2-aea908ebb099 X-Archives-Hash: 4b68efc366e51c444127698bbe966e89 On Tuesday 07 April 2015 23:19:18 I wrote: > On Tuesday 07 April 2015 15:02:36 walt wrote: > > On 04/07/2015 02:48 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > On Tuesday 07 April 2015 22:24:38 Peter Humphrey wrote: > > >> $ cat make.conf # I made a local copy and removed a lot of comments > > >> #CFLAGS="-O2 -march=core2 -pipe" [1] > > > > > > --->8 > > > > > >> [1] This bothers me. Various docs tell me to specify march=corei7, > > >> but > > >> this is an i5 CPU. Could this be my problem? > > > > Any reason you don't want to use march=native? > > Not that I can think of now. I'll try it - thanks, both of you. Countless CPU cycles later, I have now reinstalled my complete system with -march=native. I had another problem to keep me amused - KMail decided I'd deleted the folder into which it receives all inbound mail. I hadn't, of course, but suddenly my 13000 mails were gone - vanished. So I had to create a new user and import them all from the previous day's backup. Tedium - yawn... Still all my filters have gone though, and I'll have to define new ones as I need them. Oh well, I suppose it's about time I cleaned them out. Back to the original theme, I'd been experimenting with -j and -l make options, and I suspect that was my real problem. All seems stable so far, so I'll watch with interest. -- Rgds Peter