* [gentoo-user] 10, 100, or 1000mbps uplink?
@ 2009-07-17 16:48 Grant
2009-07-17 17:44 ` Neil Walker
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Grant @ 2009-07-17 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Gentoo mailing list
I'm about to sign up for a new remote dedicated system and I'm
wondering if I should spring for the 100mbps or 1000mbps uplink
upgrades from 10mbps? Is there a test I can run to find out? I'm
running a lightweight website with maybe 300-400 visitors/day.
- Grant
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] 10, 100, or 1000mbps uplink?
2009-07-17 16:48 [gentoo-user] 10, 100, or 1000mbps uplink? Grant
@ 2009-07-17 17:44 ` Neil Walker
2009-07-17 17:51 ` Kyle Bader
2009-07-17 18:24 ` Daniel da Veiga
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Neil Walker @ 2009-07-17 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Grant wrote:
> I'm about to sign up for a new remote dedicated system and I'm
> wondering if I should spring for the 100mbps or 1000mbps uplink
> upgrades from 10mbps? Is there a test I can run to find out? I'm
> running a lightweight website with maybe 300-400 visitors/day
10Mbps should be fine for that. Actually, most companies provide 100Mbps
as the lowest now. I use RapidSwitch. http://www.neiljw.com is one of
several websites running on a 100Mbps connected server there. It has
coped very well with 10,000+ hits per day.
Be lucky,
Neil
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] 10, 100, or 1000mbps uplink?
2009-07-17 16:48 [gentoo-user] 10, 100, or 1000mbps uplink? Grant
2009-07-17 17:44 ` Neil Walker
@ 2009-07-17 17:51 ` Kyle Bader
2009-07-17 18:24 ` Daniel da Veiga
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kyle Bader @ 2009-07-17 17:51 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
> I'm about to sign up for a new remote dedicated system and I'm
> wondering if I should spring for the 100mbps or 1000mbps uplink
> upgrades from 10mbps? Is there a test I can run to find out? I'm
> running a lightweight website with maybe 300-400 visitors/day.
I wouldn't think 10mbps would be a problem unless you are serving lots
of files for downloads. You can see real time throughput with iptraf
or iftop or setup some netfilter rules to log bandwidth statistics if
you want to gauge your usage exactly.
--
Kyle
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] 10, 100, or 1000mbps uplink?
2009-07-17 16:48 [gentoo-user] 10, 100, or 1000mbps uplink? Grant
2009-07-17 17:44 ` Neil Walker
2009-07-17 17:51 ` Kyle Bader
@ 2009-07-17 18:24 ` Daniel da Veiga
2009-07-18 15:54 ` Grant
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Daniel da Veiga @ 2009-07-17 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 13:48, Grant<emailgrant@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm about to sign up for a new remote dedicated system and I'm
> wondering if I should spring for the 100mbps or 1000mbps uplink
> upgrades from 10mbps? Is there a test I can run to find out? I'm
> running a lightweight website with maybe 300-400 visitors/day.
>
Most providers will have some sort of tools to monitor your traffic.
Go for 10Mbps, and if you notice slowdown, or the mentioned tools
report bandwidth problems, upgrade... My guess is 10Mbps is a lot for
300-400 unique hits per day, but if you serve downloads too, then you
may have problems in the future, as Kyle said...
--
Daniel da Veiga
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] 10, 100, or 1000mbps uplink?
2009-07-17 18:24 ` Daniel da Veiga
@ 2009-07-18 15:54 ` Grant
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Grant @ 2009-07-18 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
>> I'm about to sign up for a new remote dedicated system and I'm
>> wondering if I should spring for the 100mbps or 1000mbps uplink
>> upgrades from 10mbps? Is there a test I can run to find out? I'm
>> running a lightweight website with maybe 300-400 visitors/day.
>>
>
> Most providers will have some sort of tools to monitor your traffic.
> Go for 10Mbps, and if you notice slowdown, or the mentioned tools
> report bandwidth problems, upgrade... My guess is 10Mbps is a lot for
> 300-400 unique hits per day, but if you serve downloads too, then you
> may have problems in the future, as Kyle said...
>
> --
> Daniel da Veiga
Thanks everyone. I'll stick with 10mbps.
- Grant
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-07-18 15:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-07-17 16:48 [gentoo-user] 10, 100, or 1000mbps uplink? Grant
2009-07-17 17:44 ` Neil Walker
2009-07-17 17:51 ` Kyle Bader
2009-07-17 18:24 ` Daniel da Veiga
2009-07-18 15:54 ` Grant
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox