From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KE8fb-0007TA-38 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 02 Jul 2008 20:11:15 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 56025E0792; Wed, 2 Jul 2008 20:11:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com (rv-out-0708.google.com [209.85.198.241]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 264D1E0792 for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2008 20:11:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b17so530152rvf.46 for ; Wed, 02 Jul 2008 13:11:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=eAZ+gdKxh6CxKtXnI6j0TH/MepINl4+GW4HwOaRNhRI=; b=x7OJNC7yTAtInlQRkekKULYplmyqrOH8WzG/UscYaat6u3CC+nWRO+LJgYAjx2olJZ /aUkVUDs4erFNlw4bH8yk1BpaZnq9YnxoEaDOA/SUBzZIGzn2WMPJBNu0y2wBIG++wDl +FRWaquEQi2Q8PFOOsDhj7flSz8IYcfGX1d2o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=iE7KfZrk7gkh8NDuve4Oz7E+CNdOzaOcqwGISkjMSOT9jPEDF2DMZ3oQxknhKEmdNg 0Fr/rVwLFndKDcL2ZkLvdRAcm7ltq2aXO4gyJdFH8r1Gp5QdbGB6IbglZp5mIpggTXef p/+yDYt9SH7CTrzgZj1dkwArZjuf2Dcjz+OhQ= Received: by 10.140.204.7 with SMTP id b7mr4607977rvg.149.1215029462272; Wed, 02 Jul 2008 13:11:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.193.17 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Jul 2008 13:11:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <342e1090807021311p36078527l1af0930d875a133f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 17:11:02 -0300 From: "Daniel da Veiga" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox 3 stability In-Reply-To: <8f5910c50807021239r425ff1afr10eec112c23e2e3a@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <707E41AE68E444499861C6B248AB868453529C532D@excprdmbxw002.optus.com.au> <486BC6EE.8040907@doki-pen.org> <20080702184358.GA7955@archimedes.jfindlay.us> <8f5910c50807021239r425ff1afr10eec112c23e2e3a@mail.gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 02c99842-3aa3-4c69-bef8-b02556ba67f2 X-Archives-Hash: afb0be91c8a5d16b23a53972a588f70f On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Jason Messerschmitt wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Justin Findlay wrote: >> >> On AD 2008 July 02 Wednesday 02:20:30 PM -0400, doki_pen wrote: >> > +2 on firefox3. Faster, doesn't slow down after long use. I really see >> > the difference with javascript. The engine is much faster. Just try a >> > js >> > heavy page(like google apps). I haven't had any crashes. Only >> > complaint >> > is that flash blocker(or maybe flash itself) doesn't always work. I >> > have >> > to reload a couple of times to get youtube to work. Also, some plugins >> > haven't been ported yet. I compiled it, and here are my use flags: >> >> I've been using FF3 for about 2 months, and although many things have >> improved during the beta phase it is generally about as memory and CPU >> heavy as FF2. The only real improvement I've observed as far as >> performance is concerned is javascript. I wish there were a light >> version available. I've tried galeon and epiphany, but both lacked >> features that I really like in FF and now that there is a great amount >> of extensions available it is harder to justify using another browser. >> Maybe it's time to switch back to konqueror. >> >> > > I've noticed an odd visual glitch with blogspot pages- it superimposes my > desktop on some pages. It's a bit hard to explain so here's a pic. As far as > I know it's only this page, but might be good fodder for some of you > troubleshooters out there. > > Lots of glitches with rendering some pages, its probably the webmaster's fault, but FF2 works with them, so I switched back. Also it is a little less memory and CPU hungry, but not that much. And, in my EEE PC I use a LOT of extensions that make my life easier, and like 50% of them do not work on FF3. I'll switch when FF3 is as good (for my personal use) as FF2. -- Daniel da Veiga -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list