From: "Daniel da Veiga" <danieldaveiga@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] genkernel vs kernel manual compilation
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:07:43 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <342e1090708311407q5e669e45je44b4808e338cb8@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46D87699.8050400@lix-world.net>
On 8/31/07, Steen Eugen Poulsen <sep@lix-world.net> wrote:
> All the rest of his hate drivel is based on this kind of made up FUD
> against it and he is not alone, you see this hate FUD being spread all
> over about a decent tool, the author(s) deserve better treatment than this.
Completely agreed.
I'm a genkernel user since my first Gentoo install back in 2004, never
had any problems with it, at least none that wouldn't show in a normal
kernel compile.
I mean, it does nothing that normal sequence of compile commands would do...
Spreading that its "bad" and "breaks" stuff is just wrong with us (old
users) that use it with no problems, with new users that will not TRY
it because someone said it was bad, and with the developers that put
effort in designing a tool like this.
--
Daniel da Veiga
Computer Operator - RS - Brazil
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCM/IT/P/O d-? s:- a? C++$ UBLA++ P+ L++ E--- W+++$ N o+ K- w O M- V-
PS PE Y PGP- t+ 5 X+++ R+* tv b+ DI+++ D+ G+ e h+ r+ y++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-31 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070830184238.0e18d880@pataki.bogus.net>
[not found] ` <200708302351.44562.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>
[not found] ` <20070831012035.2177385c@pataki.bogus.net>
[not found] ` <200708310414.30036.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>
[not found] ` <20070831132353.15682d4f@pataki.bogus.net>
2007-08-31 13:41 ` [gentoo-user] genkernel vs kernel manual compilation Ryan Sims
2007-08-31 19:00 ` Arnau Bria
2007-08-31 20:09 ` Ryan Sims
2007-09-01 13:47 ` Arnau Bria
2007-09-01 18:54 ` Arnau Bria
2007-08-31 21:33 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2007-08-31 13:45 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
[not found] ` <342e1090708301509g17c2abe3k11e43b4ca2b10d8b@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <200708310417.54047.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>
2007-08-31 15:54 ` Steen Eugen Poulsen
2007-08-31 17:07 ` Ryan Sims
2007-08-31 17:25 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2007-08-31 20:14 ` Steen Eugen Poulsen
2007-08-31 21:07 ` Daniel da Veiga [this message]
2007-08-31 21:38 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2007-08-31 21:54 ` Daniel da Veiga
2007-09-01 2:30 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2007-08-31 21:44 ` Ryan Sims
2007-08-31 22:22 ` Steen Eugen Poulsen
2007-08-31 22:44 ` Ryan Sims
2007-08-31 22:53 ` [gentoo-user] [OT] " Dan Farrell
[not found] ` <64e8d2f20708301116i13b705bdhfa8c30bf708033a6@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <200708302037.01039.f.philipp@addcom.de>
[not found] ` <64e8d2f20708301152q5ffd5376hda7d77f667280db7@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20070831010931.1cc0eefd@pataki.bogus.net>
2007-08-31 23:52 ` [gentoo-user] " Александър Л. Димитров
2007-09-01 8:57 ` [gentoo-user] " Marc Blumentritt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=342e1090708311407q5e669e45je44b4808e338cb8@mail.gmail.com \
--to=danieldaveiga@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox