public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel da Veiga" <danieldaveiga@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: alon.keren@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Creating a LFS system with Portage
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:54:58 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <342e1090609191254w306ad6b2ja659bd9034d41794@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <92c85b0e0609190621t52e8d65cs5e988b0fda31c2a1@mail.gmail.com>

On 9/19/06, Alon Keren <alon.keren@gmail.com> wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > I'm not sure why you want to do this or what your line of
> > reasoning is. A stage 1 gentoo install is very similar to
> > building LFS, except that you don't have to type './configure
> > && make && sudo make install' 300 times. Well, conceptually
> > similar at least.
> >
> > The whole point of LFS is to do it by hand and see how it all
> > works at an even lower level than gentoo provides. You could
> > use portage to automate the LFS build process, but then you end
> > up with essentially a clone of gentoo. I say this as someone
> > who has built an LFS as a learning exercise then moved on to
> > gentoo for pragmatic reasons.
> >
> > Perhaps if you explained why you want to try this and especially
> > what you want to accomplish, then we can advise you better.
> >
>
> My aim is to have the ability to regularly build and maintain
> completely customized Linux systems. I simply don't want to be
> dependent - at any stage - on the whims or habits of a distribution.
> While LFS allows me to build a completely customized Linux system, it
> takes, as you say, a lot of time and effort to build a single one.
> Also, it offers nothing in the sense of package-management.
> So, what I'm looking for is something to automate the LFS
> build-process and to do it under some system of package-management.
> Portage seemls likely to meet those needs.

;) You described Gentoo! So I would suggest: "Install Gentoo". Try it,
you'll find that the "whims or habits of a distribution" in Gentoo
means flexibility and choices, and that appears what you're looking
for...

>
> From what I read about stage1 and stage2, they both come as is, which
> is somewhat problematic for my needs (for examle, if I want to use one
> version of gcc instead of another). Even if stage1 is used 'out of the
> box', some mechanism should be in place in order to build a new system
> on a chroot environment, no?

With stage1, you build your system "from scratch" including bootstrap,
in fact, having a stage3 rebuild will have the same effect, only that
you'll have a running system while you compile... Stage1 provides a
basic system, from what you'll start your own system.

>
> The ROOT variable is probably a major part of the solution, but is it
> enough? I've also found '/usr/portage/scripts/bootstrap.sh', which
> seems suspiciously relevant, but comes with little external
> documentation.

What you need is simply portage, wich is the very heart of Gentoo, and
you also want some sort of package management, wich is portage. From
what you described, you want Gentoo...

>
> >
> > > Please CC me your replies as I'm not subscribed to messages
> > > from this list
> >
> > Nope. Asking that is exceptionally rude. I wade through 200+
> > messages per day looking for places I can assist others. The
> > least you can do is subscribe to the list like everyone else
> > (and how did you manage to post without a subscription?), and
> > download the same looking for replies to your question.
> > Besides, the answers you get might help someone else.
>
> I'm sorry that you find my request rude. I would rather not go through
> 200 messages every day if I could help it, and I personally don't find
> it too troublesome to add an address to the CC line. Replying to the
> list and having me as CC will obviously not prevent others to take
> place in the discussion or read it later on as reference.
> At any case, I would look in online archives to search for any
> messages which haven't reached me.
>
> Alon
>
>
> PS.
>
> Please CC me your replies as I'm not subscribed to messages from this list
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>


-- 
Daniel da Veiga
Computer Operator - RS - Brazil
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCM/IT/P/O d-? s:- a? C++$ UBLA++ P+ L++ E--- W+++$ N o+ K- w O M- V-
PS PE Y PGP- t+ 5 X+++ R+* tv b+ DI+++ D+ G+ e h+ r+ y++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-19 20:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-19 13:21 [gentoo-user] Creating a LFS system with Portage Alon Keren
2006-09-19 19:54 ` Daniel da Veiga [this message]
2006-09-19 20:33 ` Richard Fish
2006-09-20  5:24   ` Alon Keren
     [not found] <6WsV4-8eP-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <6WutO-430-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-09-19  1:06   ` Peter Wu
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-09-18 15:05 Alon Keren
2006-09-18 16:16 ` Hans-Werner Hilse
2006-09-18 16:44 ` Alan McKinnon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=342e1090609191254w306ad6b2ja659bd9034d41794@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=danieldaveiga@gmail.com \
    --cc=alon.keren@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox