public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel da Veiga" <danieldaveiga@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 16:55:30 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <342e1090606071255g1078f4e8of65545bf1d5af956@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <448728BD.8040908@cisco.com>

On 6/7/06, Roy Wright <royw@cisco.com> wrote:
> Daniel da Veiga wrote:
> > I'm watching this topic with curiosity, I have switched to ~x86
> > recently and after it all (and a few debugging) I have all my packages
> > testing now, but have not switched to the new GCC for fear of things
> > breaking beyound my knowledge on how to fix it. So, if people start
> > replying saying things are stable with the new GCC I might switch to
> > it completely and wait a few days before the "emerge -e system &&
> > emerge -e world" completes.
> >
> I was running stable with a lot of testing unmasked.  Then upgraded
> to gcc-4.1.1 with an immediate emerge -s && emerge -e, which went
> mostly smooth.
>
> Then decided to go ~x86 for the system.  That is where the pain was,
> particularly expat which caused most of kde/gnome to need to be
> upgraded.  Unfortunately a lot of the tools to do the rebuild also
> depended on expat.  So it was update a few packages, rebuild a tool,
> update a few more packages, ...  Lesson learned is when upgrading
> to expat-2, immediately take the hours needed to do the
> revdep-rebuild (in all honesty, I didn't see the ewarn message
> because I was upgrading 448 packages).  It really would have been
> nice if the expat-2 emerge package died after giving the instructions
> to revdep-rebuild...
>
> So far (5 days) the system has been real nice, no problems.  KDE
> appears (subjective) faster (with USE=kdehiddenvisibility).  So +1 on
> upgrading a ~x86 to gcc-4.1.1.
>
> For those considering stable to testing, the main changes are
> pam-logon/shadow (unmerge pam-logon), coldplug/udev (unmerge
> coldplug), expat (revdep-rebuild), ocaml (dependent packages must
> be manually rebuilt afterwards).
>

That is some precious info. I'll remember that when switching next week, thanks.
I will not have much problems with dependencies/blocks and stuff
because I already switched the whole tree to ~x86, masking some
blocks, so, now it is just a matter of recompiling stuff. Anyway, If I
switch, do the emerge -e system and world and eventually stop, nothing
will (in theory) be broken as long as I mantain compatibility
libraries right? I'll switch from 3.4.5 to 4.1, dunno if there were
substancial changes like when switching from 3.3 to 3.4. Anyway, gotta
read the gcc upgrade guide again.

-- 
Daniel da Veiga
Computer Operator - RS - Brazil
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCM/IT/P/O d-? s:- a? C++$ UBLA++ P+ L++ E--- W+++$ N o+ K- w O M- V-
PS PE Y PGP- t+ 5 X+++ R+* tv b+ DI+++ D+ G+ e h+ r+ y++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-07 20:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <ad4496950606070647s5a4bc702m8deeda7dbd590c4a@mail.gmail.com>
2006-06-07 13:53 ` [gentoo-user] gcc-4.1.1 Mohammed Hagag
2006-06-07 14:30   ` Peper
2006-06-07 14:35     ` Julien Cabillot
2006-06-07 14:45   ` Kristian Poul Herkild
2006-06-07 14:56   ` Neil Bothwick
2006-06-07 15:00   ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2006-06-07 15:25   ` Conneries wearegeeks
2006-06-07 16:04   ` Roy Wright
2006-06-07 17:46     ` Mike Huber
2006-06-07 18:09       ` Daniel da Veiga
2006-06-07 19:27         ` Roy Wright
2006-06-07 19:55           ` Daniel da Veiga [this message]
2006-06-07 18:17       ` Evan Klitzke
2006-06-07 23:25     ` Richard Fish
2006-06-08  0:32       ` Evan Klitzke
2006-06-08  4:40         ` Richard Fish
2006-06-08 11:39           ` Mohammed Hagag
2006-06-08  1:50       ` Bob Young
2006-06-08  2:10         ` Jerry McBride
2006-06-12 21:35           ` Bob Young
2006-06-13  0:09             ` Richard Fish
2006-06-08  4:24         ` Richard Fish
2006-06-08 12:34           ` Bob Young
2006-06-08 13:31             ` Hans-Werner Hilse
2006-06-08 14:00               ` Bob Young
2006-06-08 14:28                 ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2006-06-08 14:57                   ` Bob Young
2006-06-08 15:27                 ` Toby Cubitt
2006-06-08 18:05             ` Richard Fish
2006-06-09 11:50               ` Vladimir G. Ivanovic
2006-06-09 19:43                 ` Richard Fish
2006-06-16 17:25             ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2006-06-16 17:50               ` Bob Young
2006-06-16 17:17         ` Thomas T. Veldhouse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=342e1090606071255g1078f4e8of65545bf1d5af956@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=danieldaveiga@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox