From: Daniel da Veiga <danieldaveiga@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [ot] PDF or PS format for daily use?
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 11:33:47 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <342e1090510240633p402ddf29n1dc23b803c6619ba@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0510231551570.501@Quasimodo.realss>
On 10/23/05, Zhang Weiwu <zhangweiwu@realss.com> wrote:
> Hello. I have got a lot (much more) ps files and PDF files since I start to
> use Linux. In the past there were mostly doc files but now I always prefer
> to have a PS or PDF copy to ease the compatibility pain. And looks linux
> people always prefer to send me a PS or PDF document.
>
> Because I always save two copies of every of my document, one in original
> format (eg. odt) and another in printable format for my colleagues in case
> they don't have the Linux fonts and software. Here comes the question should
> I keep a PS copy or PDF copy.
>
> I think PDF copy is absolutely the prefered format because:
> * easier to find acrobat reader;
> * can be 'Tagged', especially used with OOo;
> * possibility to 'copy and paste', though format will be lost;
> * not to take other people by surprise with unfamiliar PS extension;
> * different quanlity: I can save PDF in very high quanlity that I was told
> "can be taken to press house"
> * easy to convert to PS format when needed.
>
> Here comes the question: if the above all stands true, why do I ever need PS
> format at all? There might be some reasons to keep this format still
> existing. Perhaps in other areas, other then office work.
>
> So the conclusion: for typical office workers, we can forget PS format.
>
> Now welcome for suggestions.
>
> P.S. another quesiton I happen wish to have an answer: in one case, I have
> to keep PS format because, I can print booklet (brochure) in OOO2 right the
> way I expected, but if I carry this brochure to my colleague, and he doesn't
> have openoffice, then I try to export to PDF format, and found there is no
> 'brochure' option in exporting, also there is no 'brochure' option in
> Acrobat Reader printing dialogue box, so it's clear if I export to PDF
> format I will never be able to print it in brochure style on a normal PC, so
> I have to print to PS file and carry it. But so far this is the only case I
> think I need PS format. If I only exported PDF format, can I still print a
> brochure? The difficulty in printing brochure is you have to make correct
> page order.
>
> --
> Zhang Weiwu CEO Real Softservice
> International business: http://www.realss.com
> International sales: 0086 10 84606011
> Inland business: http://www.realss.cn
> Inland sales call: 0086 592 2099987
> --
> gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/why-not-pdf.html
Take a look at this... PDF is the proprietary modification of ps,
added some tags and some compression (that can easily be repeated with
lots of advantages in any compressor). And, well, read for yourself.
--
Daniel da Veiga
Computer Operator - RS - Brazil
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCM/IT/P/O d-? s:- a? C++$ UBLA++ P+ L++ E--- W+++$ N o+ K- w O M- V-
PS PE Y PGP- t+ 5 X+++ R+* tv b+ DI+++ D+ G+ e h+ r+ y++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-24 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-23 8:08 [gentoo-user] [ot] PDF or PS format for daily use? Zhang Weiwu
2005-10-24 13:33 ` Daniel da Veiga [this message]
2005-10-24 13:51 ` John Jolet
2005-10-24 14:22 ` Daniel da Veiga
2005-10-24 14:46 ` John Jolet
2005-10-24 14:50 ` Digby Tarvin
2005-10-24 15:14 ` David Helstroom
2005-10-29 23:42 ` Matthias Bethke
2005-10-24 18:58 ` Chris Gottbrath
2005-10-25 0:10 ` Nick Rout
2005-10-25 10:57 ` Hans-Werner Hilse
2005-10-26 0:36 ` Nick Rout
2005-10-24 20:35 ` Hans-Werner Hilse
2005-10-26 19:04 ` Antoine
2005-10-26 19:52 ` Nick Rout
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=342e1090510240633p402ddf29n1dc23b803c6619ba@mail.gmail.com \
--to=danieldaveiga@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox