From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED091381F3 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 13:12:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE16AE09FA; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 13:11:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org (mail.ukfsn.org [5.9.116.23]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE056E09DB for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 13:11:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3DBC8DC197D for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 14:11:56 +0100 (BST) Received: from wstn.localnet (78-32-181-186.static.enta.net [78.32.181.186]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7723DC197B for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 14:11:55 +0100 (BST) From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01 Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 14:11:55 +0100 Message-ID: <3416783.l22PQutCFO@wstn> Organization: Retired software quality manager User-Agent: KMail/4.10.5 (Linux/3.10.7-gentoo-r1; KDE/4.10.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20131011125555.7443c0f9@hactar.digimed.co.uk> References: <20130927222109.GD23408@server> <20131011112759.GF14498@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> <20131011125555.7443c0f9@hactar.digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-DSPAM-Result: Whitelisted X-DSPAM-Processed: Fri Oct 11 14:11:56 2013 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9899 X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000 X-DSPAM-Signature: 5257f91c46962139113298 X-Archives-Salt: acc7f63f-a2d2-4e42-9eb7-2918b9d64138 X-Archives-Hash: cdcd958e3faf78abf1342452e0704096 On Friday 11 Oct 2013 12:55:55 Neil Bothwick wrote: > While I'm loathe to use words like underhanded, ... Not "loathe" here but "loath" or even "loth". (Just to help non-native speakers avoid confusion, you understand.) :-) -- Regards, Peter