From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Swap performance
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 18:58:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3411637.6h55QLqd4n@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinOuL3EJ5T-+XoYiNP9vqKjV7qNGw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wednesday 25 May 2011 10:31:19 Paul Hartman wrote:
> When I move the swap to a slow SD card instead (2MB/sec transfer
> rate), even in that slow device, swapoff on the eMMC swap partition
> with ~500M in-use takes about 2 or 3 minutes at most with the data
> being swapped slowly into the SD card.
>
> So I think in your case it should be much faster than that!
you are comparing apples with oranges (harddisks with moving arms with solid
state devices).
Do yourself a favour. Look up how long a harddisk needs to position its head.
Now you can calculate how many times a second a harddisk can position its
head.
Now remember: swap is stupid, so lots and lots of head movement needed (and a
cash flush is running too - so even more movements to write all that crap to
disk),
The result: the whole mess is fscking slow.
You can have a nice fat raid with nice and fast harddisks - if you try to
stream to a 15 year old DLT drive with 5/10mb/sec speed the dlt drive will
constantly rewind - because harddisks suck when they have to seek. And swap
(just like a backup) = lots and lots and lots of seeks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-25 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-25 14:20 [gentoo-user] Swap performance Alex Schuster
2011-05-25 15:31 ` Paul Hartman
2011-05-25 16:58 ` Volker Armin Hemmann [this message]
2011-05-25 19:34 ` Paul Hartman
2011-05-25 20:03 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-05-25 20:38 ` Alex Schuster
2011-05-25 22:40 ` Alex Schuster
2011-05-26 16:30 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-05-25 16:49 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-05-26 20:49 ` Mick
2011-05-25 16:53 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-05-25 20:07 ` Alan McKinnon
2011-05-26 13:32 ` Sebastian Beßler
2011-05-25 22:18 ` Alex Schuster
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-05-26 17:26 Alex Schuster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3411637.6h55QLqd4n@localhost \
--to=volkerarmin@googlemail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox