* [gentoo-user] Heads Up - net-misc/netifrc-0.5.0
@ 2016-10-25 18:49 Andrés Becerra Sandoval
2016-10-25 23:16 ` Peter Humphrey
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrés Becerra Sandoval @ 2016-10-25 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 214 bytes --]
Hello,
net-misc/netifrc-0.5.0 was installed today as part of my upgrade and the
network (static) was broken. I had to mask the package and go back to
0.4.0 to fix it!
--
Andrés Becerra Sandoval
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 621 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Heads Up - net-misc/netifrc-0.5.0
2016-10-25 18:49 [gentoo-user] Heads Up - net-misc/netifrc-0.5.0 Andrés Becerra Sandoval
@ 2016-10-25 23:16 ` Peter Humphrey
2016-10-25 23:32 ` Bill Kenworthy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Peter Humphrey @ 2016-10-25 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Tuesday 25 Oct 2016 13:49:44 Andrés Becerra Sandoval wrote:
> Hello,
>
> net-misc/netifrc-0.5.0 was installed today as part of my upgrade and the
> network (static) was broken. I had to mask the package and go back to
> 0.4.0 to fix it!
Likewise here.
--
Rgds
Peter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Heads Up - net-misc/netifrc-0.5.0
2016-10-25 23:16 ` Peter Humphrey
@ 2016-10-25 23:32 ` Bill Kenworthy
2016-10-26 1:26 ` [gentoo-user] " Holger Hoffstätte
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bill Kenworthy @ 2016-10-25 23:32 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 26/10/16 07:16, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 Oct 2016 13:49:44 Andrés Becerra Sandoval wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> net-misc/netifrc-0.5.0 was installed today as part of my upgrade and the
>> network (static) was broken. I had to mask the package and go back to
>> 0.4.0 to fix it!
>
> Likewise here.
>
uhmm, "broken" can mean many things, so can you be more specific?
BillK
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-user] Re: Heads Up - net-misc/netifrc-0.5.0
2016-10-25 23:32 ` Bill Kenworthy
@ 2016-10-26 1:26 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2016-10-26 8:58 ` Peter Humphrey
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Holger Hoffstätte @ 2016-10-26 1:26 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:32:17 +0800, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> On 26/10/16 07:16, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> On Tuesday 25 Oct 2016 13:49:44 Andrés Becerra Sandoval wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> net-misc/netifrc-0.5.0 was installed today as part of my upgrade and the
>>> network (static) was broken. I had to mask the package and go back to
>>> 0.4.0 to fix it!
>>
>> Likewise here.
>
> uhmm, "broken" can mean many things, so can you be more specific?
Probably referring to https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=598078
-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Heads Up - net-misc/netifrc-0.5.0
2016-10-26 1:26 ` [gentoo-user] " Holger Hoffstätte
@ 2016-10-26 8:58 ` Peter Humphrey
2016-10-26 13:51 ` Andrés Becerra Sandoval
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Peter Humphrey @ 2016-10-26 8:58 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Wednesday 26 Oct 2016 01:26:37 Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:32:17 +0800, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> > On 26/10/16 07:16, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 25 Oct 2016 13:49:44 Andrés Becerra Sandoval wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> net-misc/netifrc-0.5.0 was installed today as part of my upgrade and
> >>> the
> >>> network (static) was broken. I had to mask the package and go back to
> >>> 0.4.0 to fix it!
> >>
> >> Likewise here.
> >
> > uhmm, "broken" can mean many things, so can you be more specific?
>
> Probably referring to https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=598078
That's the one.
--
Rgds
Peter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Heads Up - net-misc/netifrc-0.5.0
2016-10-26 8:58 ` Peter Humphrey
@ 2016-10-26 13:51 ` Andrés Becerra Sandoval
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrés Becerra Sandoval @ 2016-10-26 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 871 bytes --]
2016-10-26 3:58 GMT-05:00 Peter Humphrey <peter@prh.myzen.co.uk>:
> On Wednesday 26 Oct 2016 01:26:37 Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:32:17 +0800, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> > > On 26/10/16 07:16, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > >> On Tuesday 25 Oct 2016 13:49:44 Andrés Becerra Sandoval wrote:
> > >>> Hello,
> > >>>
> > >>> net-misc/netifrc-0.5.0 was installed today as part of my upgrade and
> > >>> the
> > >>> network (static) was broken. I had to mask the package and go back
> to
> > >>> 0.4.0 to fix it!
> > >>
> > >> Likewise here.
> > >
> > > uhmm, "broken" can mean many things, so can you be more specific?
> >
> > Probably referring to https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=598078
>
> That's the one.
>
> --
> Rgds
> Peter
>
>
Yes, that's the problem, I am glad it is already reported
--
Andrés
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1808 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-10-26 13:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-10-25 18:49 [gentoo-user] Heads Up - net-misc/netifrc-0.5.0 Andrés Becerra Sandoval
2016-10-25 23:16 ` Peter Humphrey
2016-10-25 23:32 ` Bill Kenworthy
2016-10-26 1:26 ` [gentoo-user] " Holger Hoffstätte
2016-10-26 8:58 ` Peter Humphrey
2016-10-26 13:51 ` Andrés Becerra Sandoval
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox