From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QZPwq-00073v-G3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:06:36 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6A1F1C2AF; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:03:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f53.google.com (mail-ew0-f53.google.com [209.85.215.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D7D1C2BF for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:03:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy8 with SMTP id 8so335039ewy.40 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:03:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=drqvbAss9lBu8y08hrv3YPLav1w0QOivly6PYN/4A24=; b=fQ0jk8xCzrjjc9mG0AcSjwqBz73hZi+gCHpzsvk3Ptjtj2PxM4ynfjZO2UGuL11eGI vave+PsBlvFTVt4+TRedoX8MDOmX9fiDxXXKvmdMZwyduBlTnzXQCCyYahfb47gfrvFM lA4POXugtChDwC9IzzbBX6ZMyKIAbWe7RnLYY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; b=eLiGQgUyTNBSQwOfLJWCleBml7QDDR2jc15rbdFzYRhIVL/ZXvkD8agsiQV5p4gPwi uM4jyFbLX3148YysjCNiBQomW4S9CHONp8URq6XL2ccB9u9hYdBYc2TSbmxycMOcF5qj oc6aYawjihAqxPLt9mDjAXhIaEmS6s+o8fZ5Q= Received: by 10.14.122.137 with SMTP id t9mr718762eeh.197.1308758624727; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:03:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nazgul.localnet (196-210-183-215.dynamic.isadsl.co.za [196.210.183.215]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z1sm580592eeb.20.2011.06.22.09.03.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:03:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] kdepim-4.6.0 woes Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:02:39 +0200 Message-ID: <3228639.SJ34fNAWLC@nazgul> User-Agent: KMail/4.6.0 (Linux/2.6.39-ck; KDE/4.6.4; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <4E020DEB.8040405@gmail.com> References: <1370928.tS5hQM40xH@nazgul> <23809327.SlnL0qxDPW@nazgul> <4E020DEB.8040405@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: a1c15cb7cda3ccd8d8530a1e8df64a75 On Wednesday 22 June 2011 10:44:43 Dale did opine thusly: > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Sorry for the rant and language, this has beena major > > clusterfuck for me. And where I come from, that kind of > > monumental cock-up in a QA'ed release gets you fired. Or at > > least busted down to maintenance coder. Grrrrrrr... > > Pissed off much? Just curious. I couldn't tell for sure. ROFLMBO Nah, not so much anymore. But all this was mild compared to what I did yesterday. You know that notice on the console when you get sudo wrong? It says the incident "will be reported" OK. But to whom? On my shell boxes it gets reported to me. And yesterday this is what it said: : Jun 21 11:55:25 : : 1 incorrect password attempt ; TTY=pts/194 ; PWD=/some/path ; USER=root ; COMMAND=init 6 500 concurrent sessions on that box is routine, it's a major gateway server. That poor user has not recovered yet. -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com