From: covici@ccs.covici.com
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] mplayer vs mplayer2
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 04:35:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <32126.1301474147@ccs.covici.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D92E321.7050101@cox.net>
John Campbell <jdc.rpv@cox.net> wrote:
> On 03/29/2011 08:01 AM, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
>
> > While I've been quite pleased with mplayer as tweaked by Nikos
> > Chantziaras to allow Multi threading on my core-I7 (Nvidia) (and I
> > realize that MT will now be in the upstream distribution), I'm wondering
> > if mplayer2 is now stable and better enough to merit switching.
>
> Mplayer2 installs in parallel, so try them both.
>
> I moved to mplayer2 some time ago, before the name-change to
> mplayer2. I've had fewer issues with it than with mplayer but your
> mileage may vary.
>
> After a quick comparison I'd say they use about the same amount of CPU
> but mplayer still has problems with fontconfig freezing the video for
> a few seconds whenever fonts change in subtitles. This can be a real
> problem when subtitles contain a lot of UTF8 extended characters not
> actually found in the selected font. You also see a lot of "Glyf not
> found in font, choosing another font" warnings.
>
> Mplayer2 doesn't have this problem as it shifts fontconfig into
> another thread. Mplayer itself isn't multithreaded yet, just ffmpeg.
> Mplayer2 also handles mkv chapters, which aren't really all that
> useful anyway.
>
> So I'd say just install mplayer2, add threads=5 to your config and try
> them both.
I am not seeing mplayer2 in the tree -- unless it came in the last day
or so -- and which config takes the threads=5 parameter?
--
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is:
How do
you spend it?
John Covici
covici@ccs.covici.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-30 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-29 15:01 [gentoo-user] mplayer vs mplayer2 7v5w7go9ub0o
2011-03-30 8:00 ` John Campbell
2011-03-30 8:35 ` covici [this message]
2011-03-30 9:14 ` John Campbell
2011-03-30 9:37 ` Dale
2011-03-31 11:15 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2011-03-30 10:57 ` [gentoo-user] " covici
2011-03-30 17:47 ` du yang
2011-03-31 18:19 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2011-03-31 11:07 ` Nikos Chantziaras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=32126.1301474147@ccs.covici.com \
--to=covici@ccs.covici.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox