From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923C11381F3 for ; Sun, 12 May 2013 11:30:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A49EE0920; Sun, 12 May 2013 11:30:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail0200.smtp25.com (mail0200.smtp25.com [174.37.170.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8832BE08F8 for ; Sun, 12 May 2013 11:30:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ccs.covici.com (d-out-001.smtp25.com [67.228.158.174]) by s-out-001.smtp25.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r4CBTxiY005843 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sun, 12 May 2013 07:30:00 -0400 Received: from ccs.covici.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ccs.covici.com (8.14.6/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4CBTwUM003221 for ; Sun, 12 May 2013 07:29:59 -0400 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] preserved-rebuild acting strangely In-reply-to: <20130512110941.1e174cef@digimed.co.uk> References: <20003.1368341444@ccs.covici.com> <20130512110941.1e174cef@digimed.co.uk> Comments: In-reply-to Neil Bothwick message dated "Sun, 12 May 2013 11:09:41 +0100." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3; GNU Emacs 23.4.2 Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 07:29:58 -0400 Message-ID: <3210.1368358198@ccs.covici.com> From: covici@ccs.covici.com X-SpamH-OriginatingIP: 70.109.53.110 X-SpamH-Filter: s-out-001.smtp25.com-r4CBTxiY005843 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: be7f4105-952c-4640-a4dd-ffb767039412 X-Archives-Hash: 1a463ea42922095e1b05cff7afa51caf Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 12 May 2013 02:50:44 -0400, covici@ccs.covici.com wrote: > > > Hi. I am using gentoo unstable and after this last update when I tried > > to do emerge @preserved-rebuild I get the following: > > I didn't know Gentoo specifically made an unstable version, it's > generally rock solid for me. Buy unstable I meant ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86 ~amd64" > > > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: > > > > Calculating dependencies .... done! > > > > emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "net-libs/xulrunner:1.9". > > (dependency required by "@preserved-rebuild" [argument]) > > > > I have xulrunner 2.0 installed, although it looks like nothing depends > > on that package, so I am not sure what is going on. I looked at > > /var/lib/portage/preserved-rebuild-registrybut can't find xulrunner > > anywhere in that file. How can I proceed? > > emerge -cav xulrunner I have no ebuilds for xulrunner at all in the tree. But I will try as you suggest because there seems to be nothing dependent on it. Well, that did something good, now its going right along. Thanks so much -- this is a great mailing list. -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici covici@ccs.covici.com