From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B4E13877A for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 06:36:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FE11E0968; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 06:36:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpq1.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq1.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.34.164]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F30FE0930 for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 06:35:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.34.135] (helo=smtp4.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq1.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XG0Fw-0005AA-GO for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 08:35:56 +0200 Received: from 53579160.cm-6-8c.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([83.87.145.96] helo=data.antarean.org) by smtp4.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XG0Fw-0002zn-70 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 08:35:56 +0200 Received: from andromeda.localnet (unknown [10.20.13.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by data.antarean.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C8E214C for ; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 08:35:43 +0200 (CEST) From: "J. Roeleveld" To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] unclear (to me) errors from portage Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 08:35:46 +0200 Message-ID: <3102595.NoACigVopU@andromeda> Organization: Antarean User-Agent: KMail/4.12.5 (Linux/3.14.14-gentoo; KDE/4.12.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <53E5360F.5070704@gmail.com> References: <87egwrzmcx.fsf@nyu.edu> <269cf0a1-baa5-455d-8398-363da2c703dc@email.android.com> <53E5360F.5070704@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Ziggo-spambar: ---- X-Ziggo-spamscore: -4.9 X-Ziggo-spamreport: ALL_TRUSTED=-1,BAYES_00=-1.9,PROLO_TRUST_RDNS=-3,RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982 X-Ziggo-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Flag: No X-Archives-Salt: 409e7b68-0232-456b-b9a9-60eb0adeb0a7 X-Archives-Hash: bbb357d5e4931b35f21cf9ebbde50842 On Friday, August 08, 2014 10:41:51 PM Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 08/08/2014 21:18, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > On 8 August 2014 20:13:15 CEST, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> On 08/08/2014 19:46, J. Roeleveld wrote: > >>> Hehe, would be nice if a developer would actually list the best way > >> > >> and sequence to update Gentoo with the least expected issues. > >> > >> Haha, that's very funny. Surely you jest? > > > > It's Friday. Time of hope.... > > > > Anyway. We all have our own way of doing a regular update. > > > > How often do you update? Daily or weekly? > > Depends; if I have spare brain cycles and something is happening in the > tree that grabs my interest, then daily. I tend to do it during the weekend or when I have a spare moment during the week. > The one gentoo server I have left is often monthly. The servers are done at least once a month. > Test vms get updated when I feel like it. Some of them never :-) Hope they are behind a firewall then, wouldn't want to know how quick a 2 year old VM gets 0wned if online. -- Joost