From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Rearranging hard drives and data.
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 06:53:58 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2d2e199e-c286-ca4f-6542-d33647b1bc3d@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <X+B9iN0N5Ejzg71T@tp>
Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Am Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 06:20:28PM -0600 schrieb Dale:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> Somewhat related. I googled and it appears I can hook a NAS to my
>> router and share it there. The router is 1GB, it has yellow ports. Is
>> it true that I can hook a NAS to the router?
> Maybe they meant that the router itself has NAS features. This is common for
> not-too-simple models. You can hook up an external drive and the router has
> the ability to share it in the network via samba or ftp or some such.
>
That's what it looked like in the picture. It said to plug the NAS into
a ethernet port and it would be shared. It makes sense but I didn't
know that until I read it. I guess it is like my printer. Whether
hooked up wireless or with a ethernet port, it is shared with anything
hooked to the router. If all that works like I think, yeppie!
>> I'd assume it can be shared with anything connected to the router, even my
>> cell phone if needed.
> If there is a client on the phone that can access it, sure. After all, it's
> just a server using a certain protocol.
>
>> Also, I'm looking at a new network card for my PC. With the new much
>> faster internet coming soon, I need a faster network card.
> Your PC isn't that old, AFAIR. The times of mainboards that only have 100
> ethernet should be a thing of the past.
Computer isn't to old but the on board ethernet was flaky last I tried
it. I disabled it and used the network card from my old system, which
had the same problem of a not so stable on mobo network. It's a 100MB
version. I think it is a large B. Since it is a old card, I want to
upgrade to a faster one. Until now, I never needed one. I never had
anything fast enough to need what I have now actually. ;-)
>> Router is ready, puter isn't. I found this, sorry for the caps but copy
>> and paste. INTEL GIGABIT DUAL PORT NETWORK ADAPTER PCIe 424RR i350 1GB.
>> I found a site that talks about NAS and network cards. According to the
>> article, this should be a very reliable card and just works. It has two
>> ports. I know I need one to hook to the router. Would that second port
>> cause me any grief? Result in conflicts or something?
> I have a network card for a second port in my PC. Never needed it yet, but
> it's nice to have. I usually use the onboard network to connect to my
> router. When I removed the GPU for a while, the PCI ids of the network cards
> shifted by one, so I had to adjust dhcp setup. So much for enp3s0 being
> always the same.
>
>> I been using Realtek but article claims these are better.
> Intel cards do more stuff in hardware, relieving the CPU of some load.
> Realteks rely on your CPU to do that. That's why they're not very popuplar
> among network experts. But that is only relevant if you do heavy network
> stuff like routing, switching and whatnot for other devices. Both my PC's
> network ports are realteks and they also just work and give me full gigabit
> bandwidth.
>
I wasn't aware of that. Reminds me of those old winmodems. I'll likely
get the Intel one. If needed, I can just not use the 2nd port I guess
and not enable it until I do need it, if ever. Price isn't to bad.
I'm still waiting on a time frame of when the new internet will get
here. It may be months, maybe even a year but right now, we don't know
since the people putting it out here don't know either. The sooner the
better in my book tho.
Dale
:-) :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-21 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-19 13:02 [gentoo-user] Rearranging hard drives and data Dale
2020-12-19 13:47 ` bobwxc
2020-12-19 16:51 ` David Haller
2020-12-19 17:28 ` Dale
2020-12-19 18:37 ` antlists
2020-12-19 18:49 ` David Haller
2020-12-19 20:10 ` antlists
2020-12-19 21:31 ` David Haller
2020-12-19 23:21 ` Wols Lists
2020-12-19 17:06 ` Neil Bothwick
2020-12-19 17:32 ` Dale
2020-12-19 17:48 ` Neil Bothwick
2020-12-19 17:54 ` Dale
2020-12-19 21:48 ` Neil Bothwick
2020-12-20 1:02 ` Dale
2020-12-19 18:55 ` antlists
2020-12-19 19:19 ` Dale
2020-12-20 1:06 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2020-12-20 3:01 ` Dale
2020-12-20 14:21 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2020-12-20 22:37 ` Dale
2020-12-20 10:03 ` antlists
2020-12-20 13:20 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2020-12-20 13:39 ` Mark Knecht
2020-12-21 0:33 ` antlists
2020-12-21 0:20 ` Dale
2020-12-21 2:52 ` William Kenworthy
2020-12-21 9:19 ` Dale
2020-12-21 11:26 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2020-12-25 9:41 ` Dale
2020-12-21 10:48 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2020-12-21 12:53 ` Dale [this message]
2020-12-22 0:12 ` antlists
2020-12-24 16:38 ` Dale
2020-12-24 20:33 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2020-12-25 9:15 ` Dale
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2d2e199e-c286-ca4f-6542-d33647b1bc3d@gmail.com \
--to=rdalek1967@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox