public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Jolet <john@jolet.net>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo LVM Newbie Question
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 23:14:11 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2B7794F1-9DC2-441F-93F4-8224B11A5EB1@jolet.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200602242232.35300.krakrjak@volumehost.net>



> What an unenlighten troll.  I have plenty of experience with AIX's  
> volume
> manager.  LVM2 can stand up to it any day.  As a matter of fact  
> Linux's LVM
> is about to completely surpass what is available in AIX.  LVM2 can  
> do cluster
> locking and management.  You can use LVM2 with Multipathing tools  
> just as you
> can under any commercial Unix.  LVM2 is more than ready for prime  
> time as can
> be seen by looking at RHEL and SLES distributions.
>
I think that comment is a bit extreme, don't you?

> Linux is not a toy and neither is LVM2.  It can be used as a toy or  
> a learning
> device, but it is not relegated to the closet of geeks.  And don't  
> get me
> started on AIX if you don't happen to have the OnlineJFS sets  
> installed.
> Also the draconian having to resize the filesystem by calculating  
> the number
> of 512 byte blocks in the filesystem.
>
yes, that was always a big complaint of mine.
> Do your homework please.  Just because you've dealt exclusively or  
> extensively
> with one flavor of *nix doesn't mean that others aren't up to the  
> task.  And
> just because it's IBM's Unix doesn't make it more or less ready for  
> the
> enterprise, it just makes it proprietary.  You'd do well to judge  
> based on
> features, capabilities and the completeness of the tools.
> -- 
Yes, I've supported just about every unix, not to mention every  
flavor of linux out there...for the past 16 years.  I AM judging on  
the features and capabilities and completeness of the tools.  My  
comments were meant as compliments for the progress of the tools from  
the old 2.2 kernel days, not an insult.  My apologies if i've hit a  
nerve of some sort.  However, that said.  I'd still prefer, all  
things considered, to support a volume under aix's lvm than the  
current lvm2 stuff.  However, I have NOT researched all the current  
options for lvm creation and management under lvm2.  I will admit  
that.  I wasn't trying to start a flamewar here, but I assure  
you....my homework has been done.
>

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-25  5:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-23 20:22 [gentoo-user] Gentoo LVM Newbie Question CR Little
2006-02-23 20:41 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2006-02-23 20:59 ` Alexander Skwar
2006-02-23 21:15 ` Qv6
2006-02-23 21:59 ` John Jolet
2006-02-23 22:35   ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2006-02-24  6:03   ` Alexander Skwar
2006-02-25  3:35     ` Zac Slade
2006-02-25  4:13       ` John Jolet
2006-02-25  4:32         ` Zac Slade
2006-02-25  5:14           ` John Jolet [this message]
2006-02-25  6:52             ` Alexander Skwar
2006-02-25  6:44         ` Alexander Skwar
2006-02-25  6:43       ` Alexander Skwar
2006-02-25 11:24         ` Holly Bostick
2006-02-25 12:21           ` Alexander Skwar
2006-02-25  7:55       ` Jarry
2006-02-25 10:26         ` Alexander Skwar
2006-02-25 10:44           ` Jarry
2006-02-25 11:11             ` Alexander Skwar
2006-02-25 15:01             ` [gentoo-user] [OT] " Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2006-02-27  6:48             ` [gentoo-user] " Dirk Heinrichs
2006-02-28  5:01               ` Zac Slade
2006-02-28  9:03                 ` Dirk Heinrichs
2006-02-28  9:23                   ` Zac Slade
2006-02-28  9:29                 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2006-02-28 13:53                   ` Dirk Heinrichs
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-23 20:58 CR Little
2006-02-23 21:36 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2006-02-23 21:41 CR Little
2006-02-23 23:29 CR Little
2006-02-23 23:57 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2006-02-24 14:40 CR Little

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2B7794F1-9DC2-441F-93F4-8224B11A5EB1@jolet.net \
    --to=john@jolet.net \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox