From: Stroller <stroller@stellar.eclipse.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Using oldconfig and kernel revisions ( was : Cannot boot 2.6.21-gentoo-r4)
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:19:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2AA5EBF9-49EF-4505-84DA-F4E67DE39B9B@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <469D2257.8020908@gmail.com>
On 17 Jul 2007, at 21:11, Billy Wayne McCann wrote:
>
>> It is sometimes possible to save time by re-using the
>> configuration file
>> from your old kernel when configuring the new one. Note that this is
>> generally unsafe -- too many changes between every kernel release for
>> this to be a reliable upgrade path.
>>
>> The only situation where this is appropriate is when upgrading
>> from one
>> Gentoo kernel revision to another. For example, the changes made
>> between
>> gentoo-sources-2.6.9-r1 and gentoo-sources-2.6.9-r2 will be very
>> small,
>> so it is usually OK to use the following method. However, it is not
>> appropriate to use it in the example used throughout this document:
>> upgrading from 2.6.8 to 2.6.9.
Whilst I'll admit to having been caught out when upgrading from
2.6.19 to 2.6.20, I can't imagine that many people go through the
entire list of options in `make menuconfig` every time they upgrade
the kernel.
I tend to run `emerge sync once a week or once a month, and I ignore
trivial kernel version bumps (-r2 to -r3 &c), so the only time I
upgrade is in exactly the circumstances described.
For a long time I copied the old .config file over verbatim and it's
only recently I even realised to use `make oldconfig`. This apparent
change in the way the options are laid out between the 2.6.19 and
2.6.20 config files is the first time it's failed on me in over 3
years, so I don't see the need to be overly paranoid about it.
Stroller.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-17 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-17 11:40 [gentoo-user] Cannot boot 2.6.21-gentoo-r4 Mick
2007-07-17 12:20 ` Billy McCann
2007-07-17 12:45 ` Mick
2007-07-17 13:19 ` Alan McKinnon
2007-07-17 14:02 ` Albert Hopkins
2007-07-17 15:35 ` Dale
2007-07-17 19:24 ` [gentoo-user] OT ( was : Cannot boot 2.6.21-gentoo-r4) Billy Wayne McCann
2007-07-17 20:11 ` [gentoo-user] Using oldconfig and kernel revisions " Billy Wayne McCann
2007-07-17 21:19 ` Stroller [this message]
2007-07-18 4:59 ` [gentoo-user] OT " Albert Hopkins
2007-07-19 20:33 ` Billy McCann
2007-07-20 6:49 ` Luigi Pinna
2007-07-20 9:02 ` Ian Hastie
2007-07-20 12:42 ` Albert Hopkins
2007-07-17 13:22 ` Re[2]: [gentoo-user] Cannot boot 2.6.21-gentoo-r4 Sergey A. Kobzar
2007-07-17 13:30 ` Neil Bothwick
2007-07-17 14:00 ` Mick
2007-07-17 14:46 ` Neil Bothwick
2007-07-17 15:18 ` Mick
2007-07-17 21:02 ` Peter Alfredsen
2007-07-17 22:20 ` Mick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2AA5EBF9-49EF-4505-84DA-F4E67DE39B9B@stellar.eclipse.co.uk \
--to=stroller@stellar.eclipse.co.uk \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox