From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF46B1384C1 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 14:03:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B0BE1423C; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 14:03:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail0200.smtp25.com (mail0200.smtp25.com [174.37.170.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94D501420E for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 14:03:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ccs.covici.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ccs.covici.com (8.14.9/8.14.8) with ESMTP id t7VE3gFx029990 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 10:03:42 -0400 From: covici@ccs.covici.com To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] a few blockers I can't figure out In-reply-to: <55E44B22.9090806@gmail.com> References: <14864.1440994748@ccs.covici.com> <55E42037.1060402@gmail.com> <32639.1441018993@ccs.covici.com> <55E43610.7000709@gmail.com> <24901.1441021764@ccs.covici.com> <55E44B22.9090806@gmail.com> Comments: In-reply-to Alan McKinnon message dated "Mon, 31 Aug 2015 14:40:02 +0200." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.5; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 23.4.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <29988.1441029822.1@ccs.covici.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 10:03:42 -0400 Message-ID: <29989.1441029822@ccs.covici.com> X-SpamH-OriginatingIP: 70.109.53.110 X-SpamH-Filter: s-out-001.smtp25.com-t7VE3ghK023266 X-Archives-Salt: 7d510d2f-df1f-4c92-9341-8761c2e0e710 X-Archives-Hash: 19ae1eb726a5eafdb67c5ff013492125 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 31/08/2015 13:49, covici@ccs.covici.com wrote: > >> A clue is in the ebuilds for systemd: > >> > = > >> > sysv-utils? ( > >> > !sys-apps/systemd-sysv-utils > >> > !sys-apps/sysvinit ) > >> > = > >> > That's a hard blocker, no way round it. It's in all the systemd ebu= ilds > >> > for the current unstable versions. > >> > = > >> > Do you have USE=3D"sysv-utils" set for sysvinit? > >> > = > >> > If so, to have both sysvinit and systemd, you will have to disable = that > >> > USE flag and see what comes next. > > I put that use flag in there because I thought it would allow systemd = to > > generate a service from a script in /etc/init.d, but I will see what > > happens when I remove that flag or maybe if there is another way to > > accomplish that? > > Well, that did it! It still is downgrading systemd, but that's not to= o > > bad, thanks guys. > = > $ euses -sf sysv-utils > sys-apps/systemd:sysv-utils - Install sysvinit compatibility symlinks > and manpages for init, telinit, halt, poweroff, reboot, runlevel, and > shutdown > = > = > That description is quite vague, and could mean many things. I'm no > expert on systemd, but I would imagine that it already has it's own > scripts to deal with those listed functions. I wonder what the use of > the flag is then? Perhaps an old compatibility layer than is not needed = now? > = > = > I can't see a reason why systemd is being downgraded; the previous > output either lists just "sys-apps/systemd" or uses a ">=3D" operator. > Nothing to say why 219_p112 is the highest usable version. > = > Once the emerge finishes and portage has done what it wants, run these > commands: > = > emerge -pv systemd > emerge -pv =3Dsystemd-225 > = > (225 being latest in the tree). Then we can see better why portage is > doing what it does > = > = > = I think it has something to do with fail2ban -- the version of systemd in the tree after the 219 version is 224-r1 and 225 and now portage is saying WARNING: One or more updates/rebuilds have been skipped due to a dependency conflict: and one of those says = (sys-apps/systemd-225:0/2::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) conflicts with^M sys-apps/systemd[python(-),python_targets_python2_7(-),python_single_t= arget_python2_7(+),python_targets_python3_4(-)] required by (net-analyzer/fail2ban-0.9.3:0/0::gentoo, installed) Does that make sense? -- = Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici covici@ccs.covici.com