From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RODM4-0002lF-7J for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 18:58:36 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D11A21C0C4; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 18:58:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BFE821C091 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 18:56:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by faan15 with SMTP id n15so2349056faa.40 for ; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 10:56:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=qlhl1kD/smpzCDICnWOGfSfgRhPBdQzUlEnczVw8FcI=; b=LwtL9FWvalX2uh8NMFU+6v50U1L5xHm6Rrl7Sh85uEegjqnu80Pe+IjtZX05xRt1z5 4hRjaTD8GrDFXkGR6nFj+GG5Y1KHxjJMJ435tUEOhPECVmx3urJhjBKp9573duY78w8U pxywb2jJ8G987xgk/l3UZhW/YRoSZxMcpnQBc= Received: by 10.223.5.14 with SMTP id 14mr6193437fat.34.1320864968284; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 10:56:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localnet (p4FC607F6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.198.7.246]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y10sm7693000fal.10.2011.11.09.10.56.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 09 Nov 2011 10:56:07 -0800 (PST) From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev rules for an iPod Touch? Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 19:56:05 +0100 Message-ID: <2989105.cC8N2AZ5Vf@localhost> User-Agent: KMail/4.7.3 (Linux/3.0.7; KDE/4.7.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <2215940.TJDmZqQsbe@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Archives-Salt: 53912abb-589f-4207-bb13-e5d074a885c9 X-Archives-Hash: b415b8f55ffadbf5882cd25d726f2d04 Am Mittwoch 09 November 2011, 16:19:53 schrieb Grant Edwards: > On 2011-11-09, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > Am Montag 07 November 2011, 10:28:41 schrieb J. Roeleveld: > >> On Sun, November 6, 2011 6:49 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > >> > Am Samstag 05 November 2011, 20:45:15 schrieb Joost Roeleveld: > >> >> Virtualbox has decent USB-pass-through support. Even quite high > >> >> performance. > >> >> > >> >> > Thanks for your help. I do appreciate it > >> > > >> > virtualbox is also pretty broken at the moment. > >> > >> Broken in what way? > >> I am happily using it without any issues. > > > > the worst way: > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTk5Mw > > So some Linux developer thinks it's crap. Big deal. No matter what > you point at, there's a linux dev who thinks it's crap. yes, big deal. Because they don't 'think' it is crap, they have to deal with bug reports for distros, which are caused by virtualbox smashing around in memory. -- #163933