From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QZM63-0006rr-W1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:59:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 37E961C04C; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:58:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0EE41C04C for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:58:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so654128wwf.10 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 04:58:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=D4M3Y9w7lcjw5HweVYEyyPKrxFhdmpuiv+EUtikz190=; b=IDhoDwmQamYkKtWguWM1smJetIXN3N0vlBm3EvASmuYpjOjjVKc81FUul9qkDhyjIb 46Ei555VAX9/teVta8Z4xeejuoVK/zmyGKncEn4PKSL6rlstNEnfAAT2c0gF2sairueu oxkuoGDZll/nr7mQ996Whyj3U2LJmYoH/sa2Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; b=u1+cdkQGeDaGLMDsuhoV3k82YT/bbpStukGnw2NYh2LvTP1yYAJ9lOi4WQBZNiBCrp ZT2YJqa8RacVauKcFDRCtFo+Pm+/cE7ucvVBvtjNr4iwFmyhSj0nkg5xbvA9AmoQ6y17 XKrqLF093CZeZ7c7VTsFIMReiW4MRPWqORfTQ= Received: by 10.217.6.197 with SMTP id y47mr1982525wes.55.1308743886108; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 04:58:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nazgul.localnet (196-210-183-215.dynamic.isadsl.co.za [196.210.183.215]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ge4sm384683wbb.30.2011.06.22.04.58.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 22 Jun 2011 04:58:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Alan McKinnon To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] portage getting mixed up with USE? Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:57:01 +0200 Message-ID: <2937433.i3iBPAV6YT@nazgul> User-Agent: KMail/4.6.0 (Linux/2.6.39-ck; KDE/4.6.4; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <2869451.8C6Z2vDv6d@nazgul> <20110622104754.6a51d1eb@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: ff8199ad01ebe26b4f56ec5439c94d5d On Wednesday 22 June 2011 12:48:07 Daniel Pielmeier did opine thusly: > > As Daniel said, this is what portage needs, it's been that way > > since the autounmask stuff was introduced. Or you could emerge > > Claws with -dillo and use the fancy plugin for HTML rendering. > > I stopped using the dillo renderer years ago. > > Actually it is like that since the introduction of use-dependencies > like cat/pkg-ver[use] and _before_. Autounmask ist just for the > users convenience to copy paste the needed changes to package.use. > I guess the reason for this coming up more often is that > develpopers start to use use-dependencies more often. Per my other answer to Neil, it looks like the use handling is perfectly fine, emerge is just displaying nonsense in the list of stuff it will build. IO, IO, it's off to bgo we go :-) -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com