From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-138263-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1STcc9-0001wD-4A
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 13 May 2012 17:29:49 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 825C4E05ED;
	Sun, 13 May 2012 17:29:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com (mail-wg0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809D0E0730
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 13 May 2012 17:26:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wgbfm10 with SMTP id fm10so3894747wgb.10
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 13 May 2012 10:26:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to
         :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
        bh=SD0wPwSbvl4HkAbv65ThH+E0flu1hku1wVH88mMgCpI=;
        b=RqsYcPCYqphvh1QEECSYY/l4xh+vxon47yq0JooX+EaMr8I7QA3FAXZ9Q+GNbD9vwC
         KOjZCRKyEOHtbthmbyUj3OZkVKEWgwFQzOWnISYwKWxOXUDTJ+TjNFiBpiURTlibbZKb
         DKqpwBzIp0VsFHXOPDGhcZJqgyolYG73dqWLggeK80V0wDiyhy4IaAf0OyK70DM50vqv
         rMCDynO9vk0XFM3SMfPWmHsTMv6EzIeWs39gcqK/TtZ9jCdOpcFW2EMHzG+GlrtQIlj/
         N5yIPck7OVXhKzIT7npcSmy7kwGkSPGxAultFuUwinp+XHShvlCGuXCuMykeDBTno2Yu
         SJyg==
Received: by 10.180.92.9 with SMTP id ci9mr12817219wib.15.1336929992699;
        Sun, 13 May 2012 10:26:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from energy.localnet (p4FC602CE.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.198.2.206])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id du4sm45192548wib.10.2012.05.13.10.26.30
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sun, 13 May 2012 10:26:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: Nilesh Govindrajan <contact@nileshgr.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] libicui18n.so.49 troubles
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 19:26:23 +0200
Message-ID: <2890580.tLAc5uSJFO@energy>
User-Agent: KMail/4.8.3 (Linux/3.0.30; KDE/4.8.3; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CAPo3noYZWi_vqna6kTY1wBeOm1T24viY6dfZv8KXpTf7ANSh2Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPo3noYZWi_vqna6kTY1wBeOm1T24viY6dfZv8KXpTf7ANSh2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Archives-Salt: e925943e-5fba-4c5a-a7e1-e4b15c4fdffc
X-Archives-Hash: ed9d3ddd6e6b7c38fd2b71e69d7866c9

Am Sonntag, 13. Mai 2012, 20:58:51 schrieb Nilesh Govindrajan:
> Hi,
> 
> I had to mask icu-49 because some packages failed to compile during a
> world update. I reverted back to 4.8, but now certain applications
> complain about .49 missing. revdep-rebuild isn't able to detect
> breakages and neither revdep-rebuild -L libicui18n.so.49 solved the
> problem.
> 
> How do I solve this?

just updated this noon, run revdep-rebuilt and everything is fine.

-- 
#163933