From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0236213824E for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 14:10:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F77D21C035; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 14:10:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bk0-f47.google.com (mail-bk0-f47.google.com [209.85.214.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB9A521C01A for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 14:09:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f47.google.com with SMTP id j4so6030813bkw.20 for ; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 06:09:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=lIrRaVxL/ze7/Nfel0Te7ZQLmHnkKfvnjWgprTifWGA=; b=k4y8/mklbJEAChMcYDxL4pYYmOEzZNwwkMUZ6hisYt0j3WmAqHVhhrs+dI31CpuWEY IjZcB9BDaB7v/FuEJXQ7mNFARJqBrr/z/EKApulwW1FLAwkgizmTL0ha8uI2QDoGCxgc jmdmJ6ADEwv8g16+ZUsgOHxF2uusvNig2P5Oh3z0sslGzCLY8JONAx/KioGGaU8CIVlk yzLITcIdKMhgz5XwJesNNDeTk7WZ6oWJuHkllTV3iwlz3huwvbzRCERltwi5oV6ie1if G9evJV8O/t0AMRubA9mFcw2YiEzp3qdmAfiLvtMfjVkggZUxcx9voz2jeSVMM7EpddhJ Sshw== X-Received: by 10.204.146.1 with SMTP id f1mr22775264bkv.130.1357135740445; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 06:09:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localnet (p4FC600A1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.198.0.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y11sm31295028bkw.8.2013.01.02.06.08.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 02 Jan 2013 06:08:59 -0800 (PST) From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Alan McKinnon Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Good/better/best filesystem for large, static video library? Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:08:57 +0100 Message-ID: <2836551.8CvVhdSK0X@localhost> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.4 (Linux/3.4.24; KDE/4.9.4; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20130102153801.704ae907@khamul.example.com> References: <20130102130450.6bf088ed@digimed.co.uk> <20130102153801.704ae907@khamul.example.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Archives-Salt: c7fc72f1-54e1-4f33-b89c-e4ad40fd98a5 X-Archives-Hash: da4169db5c135728371a1d808982a4a5 Am Mittwoch, 2. Januar 2013, 15:38:01 schrieb Alan McKinnon: > AFAIK, Oracle included encryption in ZFS v30 but this has not been > released as opensource. The last OSS version released was 28. > > What this means to me is that devs could include disk-encryption but > they probably won't have a standard to code to, and that implies a > whole lotta YMMV. You'd have to use ecryptfs or friends for now. ecryptfs looks easy to use with zfs: http://pthree.org/2012/08/21/encrypted-zfs-filesystems-on-linux/ -- #163933