From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S4EPq-0000Eb-Q0 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2012 16:36:11 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8FE75E0486; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:35:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from s-out-001.smtp25.com (s-out-001.smtp25.com [67.228.91.90]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95953E0486 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 16:34:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ccs.covici.com (pool-96-247-198-116.clppva.fios.verizon.net [96.247.198.116]) by s-out-001.smtp25.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q24GYwjj011875 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 11:34:58 -0500 Received: from ccs.covici.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ccs.covici.com (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q24GYsbV028201 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 11:34:57 -0500 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: bind-9.8.1_p1 recompilation failed... In-reply-to: <4F526DC3.6070602@gmail.com> References: <4F4FB82C.8090808@gmail.com> <4F526DC3.6070602@gmail.com> Comments: In-reply-to Jarry message dated "Sat, 03 Mar 2012 20:15:15 +0100." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3; GNU Emacs 23.4.2 Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 11:34:54 -0500 Message-ID: <28200.1330878894@ccs.covici.com> From: covici@ccs.covici.com X-SpamH-OriginatingIP: 96.247.198.116 X-SpamH-Filter: s-out-001.smtp25.com-q24GYwjj011875 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: 662adab2-f922-41ad-b7d5-db6ae7cb6743 X-Archives-Hash: a019c968bbdb1209f7ee9aa410aae7c4 Jarry wrote: > On 01-Mar-12 21:29, walt wrote: > > On 03/01/2012 09:55 AM, Jarry wrote: > >> What could be the problem? I remember just yesterday I updated > >> bind from 9.7.4_p1 to 9.8.1_p1, but today recompilation simply > >> failed... > > > > I'm getting exactly the same error, so I'd say the ebuild is broken. > > You might be right. After resyncing portage today bind does not > want to be re-emerged (yet I did it just to be sure it works). > Short check revealed that "-static-libs%" has been removed from > use-flags... > > : recently I noticed many times that a certain use-flag has > been activated for application, but removed a after a few days. > Not a big problem for "small" applications, but might be quite > annoying if I have to recompile gcc two times in two days, for > all of my servers. Seems to me like insufficient testing and > this should never happen in case of stable releases... > > Jarry In bind 9.9.0 I am getting undefined access to main, so things seem to be getting much worse. -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici covici@ccs.covici.com