From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SKVkm-0005EA-Ha for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:21:04 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BC38DE0E22; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:20:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com (mail-wg0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2176DE0E00 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:19:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbfm10 with SMTP id fm10so6784576wgb.10 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:19:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=/x+unjhNUCzNCL0AYS6ZhKLtoIrKSpu2hXPm49ZnJRI=; b=pAwX4ZOMg1Vr/yJSywPyhv4602fAP9r8nh2OUX1yZx9Hl6gXvL3U5zEEUR8NR447xa rJxJglNLxL4ppiT7a81hXYXbUQuOlcRY6R61LdogiHwGqswRDUGS+a+iJptDhbpVGY9h kI/QjqHcgESX83w7pkwmGqu8uFSxJpJb/SwpwgCnb0dUQQLCjjceyTrTIhKyWBPfCQmZ BgrAHLraQU/D0suHHYMsZzOqTA83g+iJX2+c499ENhYTtq/UWxNu5NcbyiksA4TOQNlp 2mRNxr71gwb/KFslDVBSgXBXhLAraiRVQB2PqFQlu0DWEyn6DnE83h8/WktQYCuhYXC5 dXLg== Received: by 10.180.73.143 with SMTP id l15mr6730205wiv.11.1334758743342; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:19:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from energy.localnet (p4FC60EFA.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.198.14.250]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e6sm34858154wix.8.2012.04.18.07.19.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:19:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] cpu sched for bulldozer Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:19:01 +0200 Message-ID: <2717403.UozbSy59IL@energy> User-Agent: KMail/4.8.2 (Linux/3.0.27; KDE/4.8.2; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Archives-Salt: a16e5743-5851-4f1c-a3ab-2fb63870f232 X-Archives-Hash: 1ced8c7ccc4ac44b48914b3426685184 Am Dienstag, 17. April 2012, 21:20:42 schrieb Andrey Moshbear: > Which cpu scheduler would work best for AMD Bulldozer? The two-level > (4 macro-cores * 2 semi-cores) system looks like BFS wouldn't work > efficiently on it. > the same that works best for everybody else. Default. bfs only works great for fanboys. -- #163933