From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-181869-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D414138330
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat,  6 Jan 2018 21:42:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D6B8E092A;
	Sat,  6 Jan 2018 21:42:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from post.dmesg.site (box0.dmesg.site [163.172.69.166])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF38DE0887
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat,  6 Jan 2018 21:42:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from matrics.localnet (unknown [IPv6:2a02:2f0a:b0b0:c56:f99d:5c64:f6f2:dd9c])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by post.dmesg.site (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 54CD1A009D7
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat,  6 Jan 2018 23:42:22 +0200 (EET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dmesg.site;
	s=default; t=1515274944;
	bh=hklxuYz8EbvnqG7OJA09yeZ3uRJCrhZFWirzYwb4dKc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References;
	b=pri5ZYF2+5DcINsSinvu6z4Hja+XlIGreLF4U7n78sU/EMcAxdnOngCJBeNqq54N3
	 6MYNU6B8AOM/6bQYmIzSn7j7Ri0fq/wrPOn6azBYLltvw0743RCGecr7P8OVY2vTeM
	 X/KGkxgEZ17BIymkmn8vXYVPyEM2qioDtzgDmRSQ=
From: zless <zless@dmesg.site>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge @preserved-rebuild failure
Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2018 23:42:21 +0200
Message-ID: <2703216.2rPtTa19zP@matrics>
In-Reply-To: <3a132e24-a5a9-69c6-1066-7c8a796cbc6b@hfigge.myfqdn.de>
References: <6eca4cee-04d5-31df-8dab-ec42947e09cb@hfigge.myfqdn.de> <2049858.yaE5jHiaLI@matrics> <3a132e24-a5a9-69c6-1066-7c8a796cbc6b@hfigge.myfqdn.de>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-Archives-Salt: 0aa3600b-d781-4935-80ef-969bbf381097
X-Archives-Hash: b827b242c8dca126ecf1ae223bc7b79b

=C3=8En ziua de s=C3=A2mb=C4=83t=C4=83, 6 ianuarie 2018, la 23:25:32 EET, H=
artmut Figge a scris:
> zless:
> >Could you also take a look at the file
> >/var/lib/portage/preserved_libs_registry ?
>=20
> hafi@i5-64 ~ $ cat /var/lib/portage/preserved_libs_registry
> {
>     "sys-libs/readline:0": [
>         "sys-libs/readline-7.0_p3",
>         "10658",
>         [
>             "/lib64/libreadline.so.6.3",
>             "/lib64/libreadline.so.6"
>         ]
>     ]
>=20

To me this reads as readline-7.0_p3 depends on libs from readline-6.3.

Smells a bit as some sort of bug. Try rebuilding readline?

This didn't happen here when readline was bumped.


> >It's like this when there are no preserved libs:
> >
> ># cat preserved_libs_registry
>=20
> I'm currently running 'find . -name '*preserved*' on / in the hope of
> finding the set with the preserverd libs *g* Well, I will let it continue.
>=20
> Hartmut