From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1694015800A for ; Sun, 30 Jul 2023 12:25:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 83D1EE0B0C; Sun, 30 Jul 2023 12:25:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01b.sbp.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01b.sbp.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FCFBE0AB4 for ; Sun, 30 Jul 2023 12:25:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=wstn.localnet) by smarthost01b.sbp.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qQ5UC-0002ih-MN for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 30 Jul 2023 12:25:24 +0000 From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Email clients Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2023 13:25:24 +0100 Message-ID: <2695909.mvXUDI8C0e@wstn> In-Reply-To: References: <2313990.ElGaqSPkdT@wstn> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Originating-smarthost01b-IP: [82.69.80.10] Feedback-ID: 82.69.80.10 X-Archives-Salt: 64bd6d01-b2f3-4157-a759-4c8639083d3c X-Archives-Hash: c55e05bafc365cec0b5dcccac9e14d0c On Sunday, 30 July 2023 13:07:52 BST Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > When I had kmail issues back in the day of early akonadi times (remember > Alan=E2=80=99s thread about data loss from then?), I tried out mutt and I= =E2=80=99ve been > using it ever since. I configured it to my liking re. list layout, sideba= r, > shortcuts, editing and so on. I haven't used Mutt in this century. I assume it's still similar in=20 appearance. > I still use KMail these days, quite often too. But it has a few drawbacks > and annoying little bugs that I encounter regularly, which is one reason = for > staying with mutt. Another is that mutt is much much faster when dealing > with big directories such as lists. Still, there is no better graphical > alternative in KDE land. Thunderbird & Co don=E2=80=99t fit in optically,= Trojita > is too limited. Agreed. A glance at Thunderbird was enough. Never heard of Trojita. Thanks all for the advice. =2D-=20 Regards, Peter.