From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A516F1381FA for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 14:09:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 397CBE075E; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 14:09:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bk0-f42.google.com (mail-bk0-f42.google.com [209.85.214.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC46AE0733 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 14:07:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f42.google.com with SMTP id ji2so5184107bkc.29 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 06:07:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=iCVxkJTWQQAOJfaew+AwAkLJBPm2Mkgk2cbTqMmS/Lw=; b=jRoCjR1i8BEPboilfkvj6Gesj1SGJ93Q7SF8b4MthlJvuwRDZ5g4j5F7X5W+Q9rrka IcbpnB1ZTXpX8El/sKnKnpT+xi/I6zPkfCtqj/nlZH6dXxpi1r+ZgNyamH9mdnZ85I/d HFomFS42n0Eh8EdrUBkUAvKS3rVq4eeQImoa7ylPwF//IKzHbxNpEUXB1XEkSYXjYt2h SNTQ+ww36yM1o1HM8ojNJnroFPrO1gduzg2raL+To31G6Oe9GiaehcSASwqFeAsQo8q+ vM1q130oCbkL1vNZaNkiyLJv0sLnVXgtwDR77Csaas02mwEc55Y/5E/thc4R6AfOgAtT a84A== X-Received: by 10.204.133.219 with SMTP id g27mr18219944bkt.65.1356876476401; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 06:07:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localnet (p4FC6109A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.198.16.154]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o9sm25868354bko.15.2012.12.30.06.07.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 30 Dec 2012 06:07:54 -0800 (PST) From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Scott Ellis Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] experiences with zfsonlinux? Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 15:07:53 +0100 Message-ID: <2679567.MC9oHyB755@localhost> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.4 (Linux/3.4.24; KDE/4.9.4; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1785965.eefX9SYzkP@localhost> <50DE011C.5040701@xunil.at> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Archives-Salt: 791d6c9a-1e4f-4c9d-af01-64015c7b2f30 X-Archives-Hash: 1d5162b09f354c70631fe86bcb5e0eaf Hi everybody, so I did it. Three disks as a raidz pool, (zfstank), and created zfstan= k/var=20 and zfstank/data Set both mountpoints as legacy and put them into fstab - I know I could= zfs=20 deal with that, but I feel more comfortable that way. Restoring all the= data=20 from backup took a long time, but not as long as doing the backup in th= e first=20 place. Write rate was, most of the time, impressive. In fact, so far it= was a=20 really painless experience. There was a hard lockup - and zfs recovered= =20 nicely. But it doesn't seem to react to 'sync' is that true or just a f= eeling? Gl=FCck Auf, Volker --=20 #163933