From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-149838-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB11C1381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 01:09:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 025F9E0E42;
	Wed, 21 Aug 2013 01:09:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-lb0-f179.google.com (mail-lb0-f179.google.com [209.85.217.179])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF3DBE0E1B
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 01:09:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lb0-f179.google.com with SMTP id v1so103302lbd.38
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:09:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
        bh=RKhXiKqDHpugojcuKd2Wb0qxfZB5DB1sf4C7IwdFAPU=;
        b=VYjZi1IYnFql77DxLu3D3VlDevK48m3gQkeYepQo2YFfQHaHJBC2oV4xqwoXOBvcEZ
         6TWyc8X0V2NHVpchZebUg8o67QA8wlcpwHSonCOv8bg0WEQzVZJ37jwygEqlTkh8g+ZC
         TVycoQUgupEde7J+CU0LItifQ+o4q3XKAGVcqCL67DCbdo46nrEdvowlrgcmlm9MhE5z
         vVCE9H0PRiqZfznizuf2i+S/o5YCPAfxcL4NQS1a6nC6NlNiHbdst4l783m3xtHtXkJq
         0gghl/KVyULya2RHSGnbdR0AZbcmCyL1Uq1rvnPNWmwNCvBtqPU4Bba9Hppc2sCaQAi3
         eufQ==
X-Received: by 10.152.2.4 with SMTP id 4mr3611909laq.0.1377047362947;
        Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:09:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from melforce.localnet (melforce.xtsubasa.org. [2a02:578:5002:8062::2])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b3sm1770674laf.7.1969.12.31.16.00.00
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:09:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: Pavel Volkov <negaipub@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Jitsi or Other Skype Alternative
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 05:09:19 +0400
Message-ID: <2664200.aUCIkiB8EH@melforce>
User-Agent: KMail/4.11 (Linux/3.10.7-gentoomelf; KDE/4.11.0; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20130820151232.GA2420@artifex>
References: <20130820151232.GA2420@artifex>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Archives-Salt: cc7911ae-1171-4e8a-951d-cc8921b67cde
X-Archives-Hash: e5a8a89da5cc785fef81e96c63a353ca

On Tuesday 20 August 2013 11:12:32 Randy Westlund wrote:
> For a multitude of reasons, I'd like to get rid of skype.  I've heard
> several people mention jitsi, but was surprised to find that it's not in
> the portage tree.
> 
> Is jitsi being actively maintained in an overlay somewhere?  Are there plans
> to put jitsi in the main tree?

There's jitsi in overlay (I forgot which). It can't be accepted into tree yet 
because it needs to be stripped of bundled libraries and not all of them are 
in tree. So the maintainer would have to add those to tree as well.

It's a lot of work and no one has volunteered yet. Find the jitsi bug on 
bugs.gentoo.org for more info.